Comparison of a Singularity- and an Inverse Design Method for Axial Flow Fans Based on Numerical Simulations

A. Theis, M. Böhle
{"title":"Comparison of a Singularity- and an Inverse Design Method for Axial Flow Fans Based on Numerical Simulations","authors":"A. Theis, M. Böhle","doi":"10.1115/ajkfluids2019-4713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this contribution two different design methods for axial flow profiles are presented. A direct method based on a singularity method (SDM) is compared with an inverse design method (IDM). For the application of the SDM a profile is used with a circular arc camber line and a thickness distribution of bisuper-ellipses. The stagger angle is adjusted in such a way that the turning of the flow on the cross section is realized. For the adjustment of the stagger angle of the cross section the fast working SDM is applied. The stagger angle is varied until the corresponding deflection angle calculated by the SDM is reached. The IDM consists of an inverse boundary layer- and an inverse potential theory method. Along the suction side the shape factor of the boundary layer is prescribed conveniently for the laminar and turbulent part. The velocity distribution at the outer edge of the boundary is calculated by an inverse boundary layer method. On the pressure side the velocity distribution is chosen in such a way that a corresponding circulation is realized for turning the flow. Finally, the whole geometry of the cascade is calculated by the inverse potential theory method.\n The examination of one cross section is done numerically using the commercial RANS Solver ANSYS CFX. Low Reynolds number of approximately 4.25 × 105 and the transition from laminar to turbulent are taken into account by the transition SST model.","PeriodicalId":346736,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ajkfluids2019-4713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this contribution two different design methods for axial flow profiles are presented. A direct method based on a singularity method (SDM) is compared with an inverse design method (IDM). For the application of the SDM a profile is used with a circular arc camber line and a thickness distribution of bisuper-ellipses. The stagger angle is adjusted in such a way that the turning of the flow on the cross section is realized. For the adjustment of the stagger angle of the cross section the fast working SDM is applied. The stagger angle is varied until the corresponding deflection angle calculated by the SDM is reached. The IDM consists of an inverse boundary layer- and an inverse potential theory method. Along the suction side the shape factor of the boundary layer is prescribed conveniently for the laminar and turbulent part. The velocity distribution at the outer edge of the boundary is calculated by an inverse boundary layer method. On the pressure side the velocity distribution is chosen in such a way that a corresponding circulation is realized for turning the flow. Finally, the whole geometry of the cascade is calculated by the inverse potential theory method. The examination of one cross section is done numerically using the commercial RANS Solver ANSYS CFX. Low Reynolds number of approximately 4.25 × 105 and the transition from laminar to turbulent are taken into account by the transition SST model.
基于数值模拟的轴流风机奇异设计与反设计方法的比较
本文介绍了两种不同的轴流型设计方法。将基于奇异点法的直接设计方法(SDM)与反设计方法(IDM)进行了比较。对于SDM的应用,采用圆弧弧线和双超椭圆厚度分布的轮廓线。以这样一种方式调整错开角,从而实现了流在截面上的转向。对于横截面错开角的调整,采用了快速工作SDM。交错角不断变化,直到SDM计算出相应的偏转角。IDM由逆边界层和逆势理论方法组成。在吸力侧,方便地规定了层流和湍流部分的边界层形状因子。用逆边界层法计算了边界外缘的速度分布。在压力侧选择速度分布,使其能够实现相应的循环以使流动转向。最后,利用逆势理论计算了叶栅的整体几何形状。利用商用RANS求解器ANSYS CFX对某一截面进行了数值计算。过渡海温模型考虑了低雷诺数约为4.25 × 105和从层流到湍流的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信