Public Administration in the Post-modern Era

Amos Avny
{"title":"Public Administration in the Post-modern Era","authors":"Amos Avny","doi":"10.47363/jesmr/2022(3)166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public affairs at the Post-modern Era suffer mainly from two major problems: A continues shortage of investment funds and b. a persisting struggle upon the main social services’ quality. The author relates to these issues by offering better ways and more sophisticated methods for combining Private funds with public demanding customers. In general, the Author suggests to divide all public activities into two categories; Category 1 – includes all Defense, Security, Law and Social services - the Software Group 1. Category 2 – includes all types of public works, Infrastructures, constructions communication lines etc. – the Hardware group 2. Principally, most expenses of Group 1 would be financed by regular budgets and funds. Group 2 costs and expenses would be financed by investment Banks and commercial funds. This schematic partition may provide a serious leverage for further development. In addition, some novel ways for improving collaboration between the public and the private sectors is offered. For improving the quality of the social services, the author suggests to expand the use of vertical modes of operation (projects), rather than the use of the popular horizontal ones (traditional organizational set-ups). A short discussion on project management is therefore included. Additionally, the author discusses the issue of bureaucracy in Public Administration. After reviewing Max Weber’s 6 major principles of the Theory of Bureaucracy, some critics and renovations are suggested. At the end the author offers some operational advices with the hope to see future Public Administration more peoplefriendly and a more human-oriented enterprise","PeriodicalId":309331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics & Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics & Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jesmr/2022(3)166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public affairs at the Post-modern Era suffer mainly from two major problems: A continues shortage of investment funds and b. a persisting struggle upon the main social services’ quality. The author relates to these issues by offering better ways and more sophisticated methods for combining Private funds with public demanding customers. In general, the Author suggests to divide all public activities into two categories; Category 1 – includes all Defense, Security, Law and Social services - the Software Group 1. Category 2 – includes all types of public works, Infrastructures, constructions communication lines etc. – the Hardware group 2. Principally, most expenses of Group 1 would be financed by regular budgets and funds. Group 2 costs and expenses would be financed by investment Banks and commercial funds. This schematic partition may provide a serious leverage for further development. In addition, some novel ways for improving collaboration between the public and the private sectors is offered. For improving the quality of the social services, the author suggests to expand the use of vertical modes of operation (projects), rather than the use of the popular horizontal ones (traditional organizational set-ups). A short discussion on project management is therefore included. Additionally, the author discusses the issue of bureaucracy in Public Administration. After reviewing Max Weber’s 6 major principles of the Theory of Bureaucracy, some critics and renovations are suggested. At the end the author offers some operational advices with the hope to see future Public Administration more peoplefriendly and a more human-oriented enterprise
后现代时代的公共行政
后现代时期的公共事务主要存在两大问题:一是投资资金的持续短缺;二是主要社会服务质量的持久战。作者通过提供私募基金与公共需求客户结合的更好的方式和更复杂的方法来涉及这些问题。总的来说,作者建议将所有公共活动分为两类;类别1 -包括所有国防,安全,法律和社会服务-软件组1。第2类-包括各类公共工程、基础设施、建筑及通讯线路等-硬件类2。第一组的大部分费用主要由经常预算和基金提供。第二组的成本和开支将由投资银行和商业基金提供资金。这个示意图划分可以为进一步的开发提供一个重要的杠杆。此外,还提出了一些改进公共和私营部门之间合作的新方法。为了提高社会服务质量,作者建议扩大使用垂直的运作模式(项目),而不是使用流行的横向模式(传统的组织机构)。因此,对项目管理进行了简短的讨论。此外,作者还讨论了公共行政中的官僚主义问题。在回顾了马克斯·韦伯关于官僚制理论的六大原则之后,提出了一些批评和创新的建议。最后,笔者提出了一些可操作性的建议,希望未来的公共行政能够更加人性化,更加以人为本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信