A Problem-Based Threat Analysis in Compliance with Common Criteria

Kristian Beckers, Denis Hatebur, M. Heisel
{"title":"A Problem-Based Threat Analysis in Compliance with Common Criteria","authors":"Kristian Beckers, Denis Hatebur, M. Heisel","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2013.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to gain their customers' trust, software vendors can certify their products according to security standards, e.g., the Common Criteria (ISO 15408). A Common Criteria certification requires a comprehensible documentation of the software product, including a detailed threat analysis. In our work, we focus on improving that threat analysis. Our method is based upon an attacker model, which considers attacker types like software attacker that threaten only specific parts of a system. We use OCL expressions to check if all attackers for a specific domain have been considered. For example, we propose a computer-aided method that checks if all software systems have either considered a software attacker or documented an assumption that excludes software attackers. Hence, we propose a structured method for threat analysis that considers the Common Criteria's (CC) demands for documentation of the system in its environment and the reasoning that all threats are discovered. We use UML4PF, a UML profile and support tool for Jackson's problem frame method and OCL for supporting security reasoning, validation of models, and also to generate Common Criteria-compliant documentation. Our threat analysis method can also be used for threat analysis without the common criteria, because it uses a specific part of the UML profile that can be adapted to other demands with little effort. We illustrate our approach with the development of a smart metering gateway system.","PeriodicalId":302747,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"52 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2013.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In order to gain their customers' trust, software vendors can certify their products according to security standards, e.g., the Common Criteria (ISO 15408). A Common Criteria certification requires a comprehensible documentation of the software product, including a detailed threat analysis. In our work, we focus on improving that threat analysis. Our method is based upon an attacker model, which considers attacker types like software attacker that threaten only specific parts of a system. We use OCL expressions to check if all attackers for a specific domain have been considered. For example, we propose a computer-aided method that checks if all software systems have either considered a software attacker or documented an assumption that excludes software attackers. Hence, we propose a structured method for threat analysis that considers the Common Criteria's (CC) demands for documentation of the system in its environment and the reasoning that all threats are discovered. We use UML4PF, a UML profile and support tool for Jackson's problem frame method and OCL for supporting security reasoning, validation of models, and also to generate Common Criteria-compliant documentation. Our threat analysis method can also be used for threat analysis without the common criteria, because it uses a specific part of the UML profile that can be adapted to other demands with little effort. We illustrate our approach with the development of a smart metering gateway system.
符合通用标准的基于问题的威胁分析
为了获得客户的信任,软件供应商可以根据安全标准认证他们的产品,例如,通用标准(ISO 15408)。Common Criteria认证需要软件产品的易于理解的文档,包括详细的威胁分析。在我们的工作中,我们专注于改进威胁分析。我们的方法基于攻击者模型,该模型考虑了攻击者类型,例如仅威胁系统特定部分的软件攻击者。我们使用OCL表达式来检查是否已经考虑了特定域的所有攻击者。例如,我们提出了一种计算机辅助的方法来检查是否所有的软件系统都考虑过软件攻击者,或者记录了排除软件攻击者的假设。因此,我们提出了一种结构化的威胁分析方法,该方法考虑了公共标准(CC)对其环境中的系统文档的要求以及发现所有威胁的推理。我们使用UML4PF,一个用于Jackson问题框架方法的UML概要文件和支持工具,以及用于支持安全推理、模型验证以及生成符合公共标准的文档的OCL。我们的威胁分析方法也可以在没有通用标准的情况下用于威胁分析,因为它使用UML概要文件的特定部分,可以轻松地适应其他需求。我们通过智能计量网关系统的开发来说明我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信