Adverse Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines and Studies of the Mechanisms Involved

M. Audicana, María Inmaculada Muro, Marianna Longo, A. Martínez-Arcediano, P. Ollo Morales, E. Fernández Ibáñez
{"title":"Adverse Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines and Studies of the Mechanisms Involved","authors":"M. Audicana, María Inmaculada Muro, Marianna Longo, A. Martínez-Arcediano, P. Ollo Morales, E. Fernández Ibáñez","doi":"10.26502/ami.93650089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Characterize the immunologic mechanisms underlying allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Material and Methods: A total of 85 adverse reactions induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were recorded and graded in severe, moderate and mild/atypical cases. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were conducted to authorized vaccines, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80 (P80), and trometamol. Total and specific IgE to ethylene oxide (EO) were obtained. Basophil activation test (BAT) to vaccines and PEG were also conducted. Results: Positive results were obtained mainly among moderate/severe patients, and also in 2 atypical cases. Both P80 and Trometamol were negative in all the cases studied. PEG was positive in 3 cases. Among 83out of 85 cases tested cases with vaccines, 11 were positive by intradermal tests and, no case was positive by prick tests. Among the 15 selected patients with positive skin tests and/or severe symptoms, 9 of them presented positive results in BAT. Conclusions and Relevance: Among mild and atypical cases, those with negative skin tests tolerated vaccines with premedication. Women and people with a history of adverse drug reactions appear to be at increased risk of ADRs and allergy to the mRNA vaccine. The most serious cases, however, have been recorded in the only two men in the series. Allergy to PEG has only been confirmed in 3% of the adverse reactions and less than 1 per 100,000 vaccines administered. Immunological tests results suggest different induction mechanisms are involved.","PeriodicalId":222617,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/ami.93650089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Characterize the immunologic mechanisms underlying allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Material and Methods: A total of 85 adverse reactions induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were recorded and graded in severe, moderate and mild/atypical cases. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were conducted to authorized vaccines, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80 (P80), and trometamol. Total and specific IgE to ethylene oxide (EO) were obtained. Basophil activation test (BAT) to vaccines and PEG were also conducted. Results: Positive results were obtained mainly among moderate/severe patients, and also in 2 atypical cases. Both P80 and Trometamol were negative in all the cases studied. PEG was positive in 3 cases. Among 83out of 85 cases tested cases with vaccines, 11 were positive by intradermal tests and, no case was positive by prick tests. Among the 15 selected patients with positive skin tests and/or severe symptoms, 9 of them presented positive results in BAT. Conclusions and Relevance: Among mild and atypical cases, those with negative skin tests tolerated vaccines with premedication. Women and people with a history of adverse drug reactions appear to be at increased risk of ADRs and allergy to the mRNA vaccine. The most serious cases, however, have been recorded in the only two men in the series. Allergy to PEG has only been confirmed in 3% of the adverse reactions and less than 1 per 100,000 vaccines administered. Immunological tests results suggest different induction mechanisms are involved.
mRNA - COVID-19疫苗的不良反应及其机制研究
目的:探讨mRNA - COVID-19疫苗过敏反应的免疫学机制。材料与方法:记录mRNA - COVID-19疫苗诱导的85例不良反应,并对严重、中度和轻度/非典型病例进行分级。对授权疫苗、聚乙二醇(PEG)、聚山梨酸酯80 (P80)和曲美氨进行了皮肤点刺试验和皮内试验。得到了环氧乙烷(EO)的总IgE和特异IgE。对疫苗和PEG进行了嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)。结果:阳性结果以中、重度患者为主,非典型病例2例。所有病例P80和曲美他莫均为阴性。3例PEG阳性。在85例接受疫苗检测的83例病例中,有11例皮内试验呈阳性,没有一例针刺试验呈阳性。在15例皮肤试验阳性和/或症状严重的患者中,有9例患者的BAT阳性。结论和相关性:在轻度和非典型病例中,皮肤试验阴性的患者耐受有药物前治疗的疫苗。妇女和有药物不良反应史的人出现不良反应和对mRNA疫苗过敏的风险增加。然而,最严重的病例发生在该系列中仅有的两个人身上。PEG过敏仅在3%的不良反应中得到证实,接种疫苗的每10万人中不到1人。免疫试验结果提示不同的诱导机制参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信