Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilities

Ruohan Zhan, Konstantina Christakopoulou, Ya Le, Jayden Ooi, Martin Mladenov, Alex Beutel, Craig Boutilier, Ed H. Chi, Minmin Chen
{"title":"Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilities","authors":"Ruohan Zhan, Konstantina Christakopoulou, Ya Le, Jayden Ooi, Martin Mladenov, Alex Beutel, Craig Boutilier, Ed H. Chi, Minmin Chen","doi":"10.1145/3442381.3449889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most existing recommender systems focus primarily on matching users (content consumers) to content which maximizes user satisfaction on the platform. It is increasingly obvious, however, that content providers have a critical influence on user satisfaction through content creation, largely determining the content pool available for recommendation. A natural question thus arises: can we design recommenders taking into account the long-term utility of both users and content providers? By doing so, we hope to sustain more content providers and a more diverse content pool for long-term user satisfaction. Understanding the full impact of recommendations on both user and content provider groups is challenging. This paper aims to serve as a research investigation of one approach toward building a content provider aware recommender, and evaluating its impact in a simulated setup. To characterize the user-recommender-provider interdependence, we complement user modeling by formalizing provider dynamics as well. The resulting joint dynamical system gives rise to a weakly-coupled partially observable Markov decision process driven by recommender actions and user feedback to providers. We then build a REINFORCE recommender agent, coined EcoAgent, to optimize a joint objective of user utility and the counterfactual utility lift of the content provider associated with the recommended content, which we show to be equivalent to maximizing overall user utility and the utilities of all content providers on the platform under some mild assumptions. To evaluate our approach, we introduce a simulation environment capturing the key interactions among users, providers, and the recommender. We offer a number of simulated experiments that shed light on both the benefits and the limitations of our approach. These results help understand how and when a content provider aware recommender agent is of benefit in building multi-stakeholder recommender systems.","PeriodicalId":106672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Most existing recommender systems focus primarily on matching users (content consumers) to content which maximizes user satisfaction on the platform. It is increasingly obvious, however, that content providers have a critical influence on user satisfaction through content creation, largely determining the content pool available for recommendation. A natural question thus arises: can we design recommenders taking into account the long-term utility of both users and content providers? By doing so, we hope to sustain more content providers and a more diverse content pool for long-term user satisfaction. Understanding the full impact of recommendations on both user and content provider groups is challenging. This paper aims to serve as a research investigation of one approach toward building a content provider aware recommender, and evaluating its impact in a simulated setup. To characterize the user-recommender-provider interdependence, we complement user modeling by formalizing provider dynamics as well. The resulting joint dynamical system gives rise to a weakly-coupled partially observable Markov decision process driven by recommender actions and user feedback to providers. We then build a REINFORCE recommender agent, coined EcoAgent, to optimize a joint objective of user utility and the counterfactual utility lift of the content provider associated with the recommended content, which we show to be equivalent to maximizing overall user utility and the utilities of all content providers on the platform under some mild assumptions. To evaluate our approach, we introduce a simulation environment capturing the key interactions among users, providers, and the recommender. We offer a number of simulated experiments that shed light on both the benefits and the limitations of our approach. These results help understand how and when a content provider aware recommender agent is of benefit in building multi-stakeholder recommender systems.
面向内容提供者感知的推荐系统:用户与提供者实用程序交互的模拟研究
大多数现有的推荐系统主要关注用户(内容消费者)与内容的匹配,从而最大化用户在平台上的满意度。然而,越来越明显的是,内容提供商通过内容创建对用户满意度产生了关键影响,在很大程度上决定了可供推荐的内容池。因此,一个自然的问题出现了:我们能否在设计推荐时考虑到用户和内容提供者的长期效用?通过这样做,我们希望维持更多的内容提供商和更多样化的内容池,以获得长期的用户满意度。理解推荐对用户和内容提供者群体的全面影响是一项挑战。本文旨在研究构建内容提供商感知推荐的一种方法,并评估其在模拟设置中的影响。为了描述用户-推荐人-提供者的相互依赖关系,我们还通过形式化提供者动态来补充用户建模。由此产生的联合动力系统产生了由推荐行为和用户对提供者的反馈驱动的弱耦合部分可观察的马尔可夫决策过程。然后,我们建立了一个强化推荐代理,称为EcoAgent,以优化用户效用和与推荐内容相关的内容提供商的反事实效用提升的联合目标,我们证明,在一些温和的假设下,这相当于最大化整体用户效用和平台上所有内容提供商的效用。为了评估我们的方法,我们引入了一个模拟环境,捕捉用户、提供者和推荐者之间的关键交互。我们提供了一些模拟实验,阐明了我们的方法的优点和局限性。这些结果有助于理解内容提供者感知的推荐代理如何以及何时在构建多利益相关者推荐系统中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信