An experimental analysis of the impact of Touch Screen Interaction techniques for 3-D positioning tasks

Manuel Veit, Antonio Capobianco, D. Bechmann
{"title":"An experimental analysis of the impact of Touch Screen Interaction techniques for 3-D positioning tasks","authors":"Manuel Veit, Antonio Capobianco, D. Bechmann","doi":"10.1109/VR.2011.5759440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Touch Screen Interaction (TSI) for 3-D interaction entails both the addition of new haptic cues and the separation of the manipulation of the Degrees of Freedom (DoF) of the task: a 3 DoF task must be transformed into a 2-D+1-D task to be completed using a touch screen. In this paper, we investigate the impact of these two factors in the context of a 3-D positioning task. Our goal is to identify their respective influence on subjective preferences and performance measurements. To that purpose, we conducted an experimental comparison of five positioning techniques, isolating the influence of each of these two factors. The results we obtained suggest that the addition of haptic cues does not influence the user precision. However, the decomposition of the task has a strong influence on accuracy. More precisely, separating the manipulation of the depth dimension leads to an increased precision while isolating other dimensions does not influence the results. To explain this result, we realised a behavioural analysis of the data. This study suggests that the differences in the performance may be linked to the perceptual structure of the techniques. A technique isolating the manipulation of the depth seems to have a more adapted perceptual structure than a technique separating the height, even if those two dimensions are equally involved in the realisation of the task.","PeriodicalId":346701,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference","volume":"532 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2011.5759440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The use of Touch Screen Interaction (TSI) for 3-D interaction entails both the addition of new haptic cues and the separation of the manipulation of the Degrees of Freedom (DoF) of the task: a 3 DoF task must be transformed into a 2-D+1-D task to be completed using a touch screen. In this paper, we investigate the impact of these two factors in the context of a 3-D positioning task. Our goal is to identify their respective influence on subjective preferences and performance measurements. To that purpose, we conducted an experimental comparison of five positioning techniques, isolating the influence of each of these two factors. The results we obtained suggest that the addition of haptic cues does not influence the user precision. However, the decomposition of the task has a strong influence on accuracy. More precisely, separating the manipulation of the depth dimension leads to an increased precision while isolating other dimensions does not influence the results. To explain this result, we realised a behavioural analysis of the data. This study suggests that the differences in the performance may be linked to the perceptual structure of the techniques. A technique isolating the manipulation of the depth seems to have a more adapted perceptual structure than a technique separating the height, even if those two dimensions are equally involved in the realisation of the task.
触摸屏交互技术对三维定位任务影响的实验分析
使用触摸屏交互(TSI)进行3- d交互需要增加新的触觉线索和分离任务自由度(DoF)的操作:一个3自由度任务必须转换为2-D+1-D任务,才能使用触摸屏完成。在本文中,我们研究了这两个因素在三维定位任务中的影响。我们的目标是确定它们各自对主观偏好和性能测量的影响。为此,我们对五种定位技术进行了实验比较,分离出这两个因素各自的影响。我们得到的结果表明,触觉线索的增加不影响用户的精度。然而,任务的分解对精度有很大的影响。更准确地说,分离深度维度的操作可以提高精度,而隔离其他维度不会影响结果。为了解释这一结果,我们对数据进行了行为分析。这项研究表明,表现上的差异可能与技术的感知结构有关。分离深度操作的技术似乎比分离高度的技术具有更适应的感知结构,即使这两个维度在任务的实现中同样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信