Competition with Three-Tier Spectrum Access and Spectrum Monitoring

A. Ghosh, R. Berry
{"title":"Competition with Three-Tier Spectrum Access and Spectrum Monitoring","authors":"A. Ghosh, R. Berry","doi":"10.1145/3323679.3326522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) recently adopted in the U.S. enables two tiers of commercial users to share spectrum with a third tier of incumbent users. This sharing can be further assisted by Environmental Sensing Capability operators (ESCs), that monitor the spectrum occupancy to determine when use of the spectrum will not harm incumbents. Two key aspects of this framework that impact how firms may compete are the differences in information provided by different ESCs and the different tiers in which a firm may access the spectrum. We develop a game theoretic model that captures both of these features and analyze it to gain insight into their impact. Specifically, we consider a priority access (PA) tier firm has access to the both a licensed band and an unlicensed band, and a general authorized access (GAA) tier firm has access only to the unlicensed band. The PA tier and GAA tier firms compete for users. Our analysis reveals that the amount of unlicensed and licensed bandwidth must be chosen judiciously in order to maximize the social welfare. We also show that a limited amount of unlicensed access by the PA tier firm is beneficial to the user's surplus as well as to the social welfare.","PeriodicalId":205641,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3323679.3326522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) recently adopted in the U.S. enables two tiers of commercial users to share spectrum with a third tier of incumbent users. This sharing can be further assisted by Environmental Sensing Capability operators (ESCs), that monitor the spectrum occupancy to determine when use of the spectrum will not harm incumbents. Two key aspects of this framework that impact how firms may compete are the differences in information provided by different ESCs and the different tiers in which a firm may access the spectrum. We develop a game theoretic model that captures both of these features and analyze it to gain insight into their impact. Specifically, we consider a priority access (PA) tier firm has access to the both a licensed band and an unlicensed band, and a general authorized access (GAA) tier firm has access only to the unlicensed band. The PA tier and GAA tier firms compete for users. Our analysis reveals that the amount of unlicensed and licensed bandwidth must be chosen judiciously in order to maximize the social welfare. We also show that a limited amount of unlicensed access by the PA tier firm is beneficial to the user's surplus as well as to the social welfare.
与三层频谱接入和频谱监控的竞争
最近在美国采用的公民宽带无线电服务(CBRS)使两层商业用户能够与第三层现有用户共享频谱。环境感知能力运营商(esc)可以进一步协助这种共享,他们监测频谱占用情况,以确定何时使用频谱不会损害现有运营商。该框架影响企业竞争方式的两个关键方面是不同ESCs提供的信息的差异,以及企业访问频谱的不同层次。我们开发了一个博弈论模型来捕捉这两个特征,并对其进行分析,以深入了解它们的影响。具体地说,我们认为优先接入(PA)层公司可以访问许可频带和未许可频带,而一般授权接入(GAA)层公司只能访问未许可频带。PA级和GAA级公司争夺用户。我们的分析表明,为了使社会福利最大化,必须明智地选择非许可和许可带宽的数量。我们还证明了PA层企业的有限数量的未经许可的访问有利于用户的剩余和社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信