Murat Önal, M. Ağar, Ayşe Şeyma Küçükakça, T. Gürbüz
{"title":"Comparison of different endometrial preparation protocols in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome","authors":"Murat Önal, M. Ağar, Ayşe Şeyma Küçükakça, T. Gürbüz","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1218259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the most suitable endometrial preparation protocols such as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) suppression, HRT without GnRH-a suppression and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).Material and Method: We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 161 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze-all” strategy between December 2018 and August 2020 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: HRT with GnRH-a suppression (n=43); HRT without GnRH-a suppression (n=86); mild-OS (n=32).Results: The biochemical pregnancy results (55.8 % vs 54.65 % vs 53, p=0.900), ongoing pregnancy rates (44.2 % vs 43 % vs 40.62, p=0.572), and abort rates (20.8 % vs 21.3 % vs 23.52, p=0.900) were similar between the HRT with GnRH-a suppression, without GnRH-a suppression and mild-OS, respectively. This study showed no statistically significant difference between the three protocols in laboratory parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no statistically difference between three groups in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Dependent on clinical experience and facility, one of these protocols could be deployed for FET in women with PCOS.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"529 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1218259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the most suitable endometrial preparation protocols such as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) suppression, HRT without GnRH-a suppression and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).Material and Method: We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 161 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze-all” strategy between December 2018 and August 2020 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: HRT with GnRH-a suppression (n=43); HRT without GnRH-a suppression (n=86); mild-OS (n=32).Results: The biochemical pregnancy results (55.8 % vs 54.65 % vs 53, p=0.900), ongoing pregnancy rates (44.2 % vs 43 % vs 40.62, p=0.572), and abort rates (20.8 % vs 21.3 % vs 23.52, p=0.900) were similar between the HRT with GnRH-a suppression, without GnRH-a suppression and mild-OS, respectively. This study showed no statistically significant difference between the three protocols in laboratory parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no statistically difference between three groups in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Dependent on clinical experience and facility, one of these protocols could be deployed for FET in women with PCOS.
目的:本研究旨在探讨抑制促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRH-a)的激素替代疗法(HRT)、不抑制GnRH-a的激素替代疗法(HRT)和轻度卵巢刺激(OS)治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的子宫内膜准备方案。材料和方法:我们对161名PCOS女性进行了历史队列分析,这些女性在2018年12月至2020年8月期间因卵巢过度刺激综合征的高风险而接受了“冷冻”策略。采用三种子宫内膜准备方案:HRT联合GnRH-a抑制(n=43);HRT未抑制GnRH-a (n=86);mild-OS (n = 32)。结果:GnRH-a抑制组生化妊娠结果(55.8% vs 54.65% vs 53.3%, p=0.900)、妊娠持续率(44.2% vs 43% vs 40.62, p=0.572)、流产率(20.8% vs 21.3% vs 23.52, p=0.900)与轻度os组差异无统计学意义。本研究显示,三种方案的实验室参数差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:三组妊娠结局无统计学差异。根据临床经验和设施的不同,这些方案之一可以用于PCOS妇女的FET。