A Hierarchical Multiscale Framework for History Matching and Optimal Well Placement for a HPHT Fractured Gas Reservoir, Tarim Basin, China

Hongquan Chen, Changdong Yang, A. Datta-Gupta, Jianye Zhang, Liqun Chen, Liu Lei, Baoxin Chen, X. Cui, F. Shi, A. Bahar
{"title":"A Hierarchical Multiscale Framework for History Matching and Optimal Well Placement for a HPHT Fractured Gas Reservoir, Tarim Basin, China","authors":"Hongquan Chen, Changdong Yang, A. Datta-Gupta, Jianye Zhang, Liqun Chen, Liu Lei, Baoxin Chen, X. Cui, F. Shi, A. Bahar","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19314-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n History matching of million-cell reservoir models still remains an outstanding challenge for the industry. This paper presents a hierarchical multi-scale approach to history matching high resolution dual porosity reservoir models using a combination of evolutionary algorithm and streamline method. The efficacy of the approach is demonstrated through application to a high pressure high temperature (HPHT) fractured gas reservoir in the Tarim basin, China with wells located at an average depth of 7500 meters.\n Our proposed multi-scale history matching approach consists of two-stages: global and local. For the global stage, we calibrate coarse-scale static and dynamic parameters using an evolutionary algorithm. The global calibration uses coarse-scale simulations and applies regional multipliers to match RFT data, well bottom hole pressures, and field average pressure. For the local stage, we calibrate fracture permeability using streamline based sensitivities to further match well bottom-hole pressures. The streamlines are derived from the fracture cell fluxes and the sensitivities are analytically computed for highly compressible flow. The sensitivities are validated by comparison with the pertubation method.\n The proposed hierarchical multiscale history matching workflow is applied to a faulted and highly fractured deep gas reservoir in the Tarim basin, China. The excessive well cost arising from the large well depth (7500 meters) and high pressure (18000 psi) necessitates optimal field development with limited number of wells. The fracture properties of dual porosity model are upscaled from a highly dense discrete fracture network model generated based on well data and seismic attributes. The history matching includes RFT data, static pressure data and flowing bottom-hole pressure data in producing wells. Field average pressure and RFT (static pressure) data were well matched during the global stage using coarse scale models while flowing bottom-hole pressure is further matched during the local stage calibration using fine scale models. Streamline method has been applied previously mainly to incompressible or slightly compressible flow. However in this application, the results show that the modified streamline-based sensitivity can also significantly reduce data misfit for highly compressible flow. The history matched models are used to visualize well drainage volumes using streamlines. The well drainage volumes in conjunction with static reservoir properties are used to define a ‘depletion capacity map’ which is then used for optimal infill well placement.\n The novelty of our approach lies in the application of streamlines derived from dual porosity finite-difference simulation to facilitate history matching and well placement optimization in a tight gas reservoir. The newly developed streamline-based analytical sensitivities are suitable for highly compressible flow. To our knowledge, this is the first time streamlines have been used to facilitate history matching and optimal well placement for gas reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":105730,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 27, 2019","volume":"132 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 27, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19314-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

History matching of million-cell reservoir models still remains an outstanding challenge for the industry. This paper presents a hierarchical multi-scale approach to history matching high resolution dual porosity reservoir models using a combination of evolutionary algorithm and streamline method. The efficacy of the approach is demonstrated through application to a high pressure high temperature (HPHT) fractured gas reservoir in the Tarim basin, China with wells located at an average depth of 7500 meters. Our proposed multi-scale history matching approach consists of two-stages: global and local. For the global stage, we calibrate coarse-scale static and dynamic parameters using an evolutionary algorithm. The global calibration uses coarse-scale simulations and applies regional multipliers to match RFT data, well bottom hole pressures, and field average pressure. For the local stage, we calibrate fracture permeability using streamline based sensitivities to further match well bottom-hole pressures. The streamlines are derived from the fracture cell fluxes and the sensitivities are analytically computed for highly compressible flow. The sensitivities are validated by comparison with the pertubation method. The proposed hierarchical multiscale history matching workflow is applied to a faulted and highly fractured deep gas reservoir in the Tarim basin, China. The excessive well cost arising from the large well depth (7500 meters) and high pressure (18000 psi) necessitates optimal field development with limited number of wells. The fracture properties of dual porosity model are upscaled from a highly dense discrete fracture network model generated based on well data and seismic attributes. The history matching includes RFT data, static pressure data and flowing bottom-hole pressure data in producing wells. Field average pressure and RFT (static pressure) data were well matched during the global stage using coarse scale models while flowing bottom-hole pressure is further matched during the local stage calibration using fine scale models. Streamline method has been applied previously mainly to incompressible or slightly compressible flow. However in this application, the results show that the modified streamline-based sensitivity can also significantly reduce data misfit for highly compressible flow. The history matched models are used to visualize well drainage volumes using streamlines. The well drainage volumes in conjunction with static reservoir properties are used to define a ‘depletion capacity map’ which is then used for optimal infill well placement. The novelty of our approach lies in the application of streamlines derived from dual porosity finite-difference simulation to facilitate history matching and well placement optimization in a tight gas reservoir. The newly developed streamline-based analytical sensitivities are suitable for highly compressible flow. To our knowledge, this is the first time streamlines have been used to facilitate history matching and optimal well placement for gas reservoirs.
塔里木盆地高温高压裂缝性气藏历史拟合及优选井位的分层多尺度框架
百万单元油藏模型的历史匹配仍然是行业面临的一个突出挑战。提出了一种结合进化算法和流线法的分层多尺度高分辨率双孔隙度储层模型历史拟合方法。在塔里木盆地平均井深7500米的高压高温(HPHT)裂缝气藏的应用中,验证了该方法的有效性。我们提出的多尺度历史匹配方法包括两个阶段:全局和局部。对于全局阶段,我们使用进化算法校准粗尺度静态和动态参数。全球校准使用粗尺度模拟,并应用区域乘数来匹配RFT数据、井底压力和现场平均压力。对于局部阶段,我们使用基于流线的灵敏度来校准裂缝渗透率,以进一步匹配井底压力。流线由裂缝胞通量导出,并对高可压缩流的灵敏度进行了解析计算。通过与摄动法的比较,验证了该方法的灵敏度。将提出的分层多尺度历史匹配工作流应用于塔里木盆地深部断裂和高裂缝气藏。由于大井深(7500米)和高压(18000 psi)造成了过高的成本,因此需要在有限的井数下进行最佳的油田开发。双重孔隙度模型的裂缝性质是基于井数据和地震属性生成的高密度离散裂缝网络模型的升级。历史拟合包括RFT数据、静压数据和生产井井底流动压力数据。在全球阶段,使用粗比尺模型可以很好地匹配现场平均压力和RFT(静压)数据,而在局部阶段校准期间,使用细比尺模型进一步匹配井底流动压力。流线法以前主要应用于不可压缩或微可压缩的流动。然而,在此应用中,结果表明,改进的基于流线的灵敏度也可以显着减少高可压缩流的数据不拟合。历史匹配模型用于使用流线可视化井排水量。井的排水量与静态储层特性一起用于定义“枯竭能力图”,然后用于最佳的填充井布置。该方法的新颖之处在于应用了双孔隙度有限差分模拟的流线,以促进致密气藏的历史匹配和井位优化。新开发的基于流线的分析灵敏度适用于高可压缩流。据我们所知,这是第一次使用流线来促进历史匹配和气藏的最佳井位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信