“It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time”: Hollywood, Homology, and Hired Guns—the Making of The Magnificent Seven

Paul Kerr
{"title":"“It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time”: Hollywood, Homology, and Hired Guns—the Making of The Magnificent Seven","authors":"Paul Kerr","doi":"10.5040/9781501343520.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vin (Steve McQueen): It’s like this fellow I knew in El Paso. One day, he just took all his clothes off and jumped in a mess of cactus. I asked him that same question, ‘Why?’ \nCalvera (Eli Wallach): And? \nVin: He said, ‘It seemed like a good idea at the time.’ \n \nWhy did The Magnificent Seven (1960) seem “like a good idea at the time?” Conventional film history suggests it simply adapted a pre-tested plot from one national cinema market and genre to another. But that doesn’t explain why Seven Samurai (1954) was adapted when or how it was. By way of an A to Z of film theory’s creation myths – from Auteurism to Zeitgeist - this essay looks at the specific industrial conjuncture of the independent production of the film, by the Mirisch Company (Kerr, 2011). The chapter combines the author’s interviews with the surviving cast and crew, the film’s production files, and contemporary film industry trade papers’ coverage of the production company – and the production itself - with Janet Staiger’s seminal analysis of the package-unit system of production (Bordwell, Thompson, Staiger, 1985). In the absence of a convincing critical case having been made for either the film’s director as an auteur or for American ideology to be reflected – or indeed predicted – by the film, it analyses instead the precise conditions of the film’s production. And it concludes by arguing that The Magnificent Seven wasn’t just one of the first ‘professional’ westerns (Wright, 1975), nor one of the earliest ‘counterinsurgency films’ (Slotkin, 1992), but it was a so-called ‘runaway’ production, made by one of the first and most successful of the major ‘independents’ to emerge in the wake of the demise of the vertically integrated studios (Balio, 1987) – and that those facts are far from unconnected. The protagonists (a team of freelance gunfighters hired to do a job – protect a village) and the filmmakers (a team of freelance employees hired to do a job – produce a film) are mirror images of each other. In doing so it demonstrates how structural homologies find their way into Hollywood’s narrative forms.","PeriodicalId":338636,"journal":{"name":"Reframing Cult Westerns","volume":"513 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reframing Cult Westerns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501343520.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vin (Steve McQueen): It’s like this fellow I knew in El Paso. One day, he just took all his clothes off and jumped in a mess of cactus. I asked him that same question, ‘Why?’ Calvera (Eli Wallach): And? Vin: He said, ‘It seemed like a good idea at the time.’ Why did The Magnificent Seven (1960) seem “like a good idea at the time?” Conventional film history suggests it simply adapted a pre-tested plot from one national cinema market and genre to another. But that doesn’t explain why Seven Samurai (1954) was adapted when or how it was. By way of an A to Z of film theory’s creation myths – from Auteurism to Zeitgeist - this essay looks at the specific industrial conjuncture of the independent production of the film, by the Mirisch Company (Kerr, 2011). The chapter combines the author’s interviews with the surviving cast and crew, the film’s production files, and contemporary film industry trade papers’ coverage of the production company – and the production itself - with Janet Staiger’s seminal analysis of the package-unit system of production (Bordwell, Thompson, Staiger, 1985). In the absence of a convincing critical case having been made for either the film’s director as an auteur or for American ideology to be reflected – or indeed predicted – by the film, it analyses instead the precise conditions of the film’s production. And it concludes by arguing that The Magnificent Seven wasn’t just one of the first ‘professional’ westerns (Wright, 1975), nor one of the earliest ‘counterinsurgency films’ (Slotkin, 1992), but it was a so-called ‘runaway’ production, made by one of the first and most successful of the major ‘independents’ to emerge in the wake of the demise of the vertically integrated studios (Balio, 1987) – and that those facts are far from unconnected. The protagonists (a team of freelance gunfighters hired to do a job – protect a village) and the filmmakers (a team of freelance employees hired to do a job – produce a film) are mirror images of each other. In doing so it demonstrates how structural homologies find their way into Hollywood’s narrative forms.
“当时这似乎是个好主意”:好莱坞、同源词和雇佣枪手——《豪勇七蛟龙》的制作
Vin(史蒂夫·麦奎因):就像我在埃尔帕索认识的一个家伙。有一天,他把衣服都脱了,跳进一堆仙人掌里。我问他同样的问题,‘为什么?卡尔维拉(伊莱·瓦拉赫):然后呢?Vin:他说,‘当时这似乎是个好主意。为什么《豪勇七蛟龙》(1960)在当时看起来“是个好主意”?传统的电影史表明,它只是将一个预先测试过的情节从一个国家的电影市场和类型改编到另一个国家。但这并不能解释为什么《七武士》(1954)会在何时、以何种方式被改编。通过从A到Z的电影理论创作神话——从作者主义到时代精神——本文着眼于Mirisch公司(Kerr, 2011)独立制作电影的具体工业形势。本章结合了作者对幸存的演员和工作人员的采访,电影的制作文件,当代电影工业贸易报纸对制作公司和制作本身的报道,以及珍妮特·斯塔格(Janet Staiger)对制作的包装单元系统的开创性分析(Bordwell, Thompson, Staiger, 1985)。在缺乏令人信服的关键案例的情况下,无论是作为导演的电影导演,还是美国意识形态的反映——或者实际上是预测——这部电影,它分析了电影制作的精确条件。文章的结论是,《豪侠七蛟龙》不仅是第一部“专业”西部片(赖特,1975年),也不是最早的“反叛乱电影”(斯洛特金,1992年),而且是一部所谓的“失控”作品,是由垂直整合的电影公司倒闭后涌现的第一批、也是最成功的主要“独立”电影公司之一(巴利奥,1987年)制作的——而这些事实绝非毫无关联。主角(一群受雇保护村庄的自由枪手)和电影制作人(一群受雇做某件事的自由雇员——制作一部电影)是彼此的镜像。在这样做的过程中,它展示了结构同源性是如何进入好莱坞的叙事形式的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信