Evaluation of the Remaining Prestress Force and Center Negative Bending Moment in Crossties Removed From Track After 25 Years of Service

James D. Scott, R. Peterman, A. Robertson, B. T. Beck, K. Riding
{"title":"Evaluation of the Remaining Prestress Force and Center Negative Bending Moment in Crossties Removed From Track After 25 Years of Service","authors":"James D. Scott, R. Peterman, A. Robertson, B. T. Beck, K. Riding","doi":"10.1115/JRC2019-1275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive research is currently being conducted by the team to understand the prestressing steel and concrete properties that cause high bonding stresses and lead to longitudinal splitting cracks, and how to mitigate this failure in future designs. One parameter of interest that affects the bonding stress is the amount of prestressing force in a crosstie. To help quantify the amount of prestress force necessary to provide a durable long-term crosstie, a study on existing crossties that have performed well in track for over 25 years was conducted to evaluate the center negative bending moment, and determine the remaining prestress force for each tie.\n The remaining prestress force in each tie was determined using a new proposed method in which ties are loaded in direct tension. The new test method was also conducted on new ties instrumented with vibrating wire strain gages to verify the method. The testing results reveal that a majority of the existing ties evaluated have a remaining prestress force in the range of 84–95 kips. These forces are significantly lower than the remaining prestress force after losses of newer tie designs. This can be seen when comparing the tension test results of the existing ties with the results of the new ties.\n Ties were loaded upside-down in four-point bending to determine their center negative cracking moments. The test setup and procedure used closely resembles the center negative bending moment test outlined in AREMA 30, with minor variations. For each different tie design in the study, the center negative design moment was calculated following the AREMA 30 procedure, and compared to the experimental cracking moments. Of the seven different existing tie designs investigated, four would meet the requirements of the current AREMA 30 center negative bending test.","PeriodicalId":287025,"journal":{"name":"2019 Joint Rail Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Joint Rail Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2019-1275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Extensive research is currently being conducted by the team to understand the prestressing steel and concrete properties that cause high bonding stresses and lead to longitudinal splitting cracks, and how to mitigate this failure in future designs. One parameter of interest that affects the bonding stress is the amount of prestressing force in a crosstie. To help quantify the amount of prestress force necessary to provide a durable long-term crosstie, a study on existing crossties that have performed well in track for over 25 years was conducted to evaluate the center negative bending moment, and determine the remaining prestress force for each tie. The remaining prestress force in each tie was determined using a new proposed method in which ties are loaded in direct tension. The new test method was also conducted on new ties instrumented with vibrating wire strain gages to verify the method. The testing results reveal that a majority of the existing ties evaluated have a remaining prestress force in the range of 84–95 kips. These forces are significantly lower than the remaining prestress force after losses of newer tie designs. This can be seen when comparing the tension test results of the existing ties with the results of the new ties. Ties were loaded upside-down in four-point bending to determine their center negative cracking moments. The test setup and procedure used closely resembles the center negative bending moment test outlined in AREMA 30, with minor variations. For each different tie design in the study, the center negative design moment was calculated following the AREMA 30 procedure, and compared to the experimental cracking moments. Of the seven different existing tie designs investigated, four would meet the requirements of the current AREMA 30 center negative bending test.
25年退役轨道交叉梁剩余预应力和中心负弯矩的评估
该团队目前正在进行广泛的研究,以了解预应力钢和混凝土的特性,这些特性会导致高粘合应力并导致纵向分裂裂缝,以及如何在未来的设计中减轻这种失败。影响粘接应力的一个重要参数是十字路口的预应力量。为了帮助量化提供持久的长期交叉所需的预应力量,对现有的在轨道上运行超过25年的交叉进行了研究,以评估中心负弯矩,并确定每个连接的剩余预应力。采用一种新提出的方法确定了每个扎杆的剩余预应力,其中扎杆以直接张力加载。用振动丝应变仪对新领带进行了测试,验证了新方法的有效性。测试结果表明,大多数现有的评估纽带的剩余预应力范围在84-95基普。这些力明显低于新设计损失后的剩余预应力。这一点可以从对比现有系带与新系带的张力试验结果中看出。在四点弯曲中,领带被倒置加载,以确定其中心负开裂力矩。所使用的测试设置和程序与AREMA 30中概述的中心负弯矩测试非常相似,只有微小的变化。根据AREMA - 30程序计算了各节点的中心负设计弯矩,并与试验开裂弯矩进行了比较。在调查的7种不同的现有领带设计中,有4种符合当前AREMA 30中心负弯曲试验的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信