Martin Gabel, A. Hoppe, R. Scheiner, Jörg Obergfell, R. Büchler
{"title":"Heritability of Apis mellifera recapping behavior and suppressed mite reproduction as resistance traits towards Varroa destructor","authors":"Martin Gabel, A. Hoppe, R. Scheiner, Jörg Obergfell, R. Büchler","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2023.1135187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of honeybee strains resistant to the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is generally considered as one of the most sustainable ways of coping with this major bee parasite. Thus, breeding efforts increasingly focus on resistance parameters in addition to common beekeeping traits like honey yield and gentleness. In every breeding effort, the success strongly depends on the quantifiability and heritability of the traits accounted. To find the most suitable traits among the manifold variants to assess Varroa resistance, it is necessary to evaluate how easily a trait can be measured (i.e., testing effort) in relation to the underlying heritability (i.e., expected transfer to the following generation). Various possible selection traits are described as beneficial for colony survival in the presence of Varroa destructor and therefore are measured in breeding stocks around the globe. Two of them in particular, suppressed mite reproduction (SMR, sensu lato any reproductive failure of mother mites) and recapping of already sealed brood cells have recently gained increasing attention among the breeders because they closely resemble resistance mechanisms of some Varroa-surviving honeybee populations. However, it was still unknown whether the genetic background of the trait is sufficient for targeted selection. We therefore investigated the heritabilities and genetic correlations for SMR and REC, distinguishing between recapping of infested cells (RECinf) and all cells (RECall), on an extensive dataset of Buckfast and Carniolan stock in Germany. With an accessible h² of 0.18 and 0.44 for SMR and an accessible h² of 0.44 and 0.40 for RECinf, both traits turned out to be very promising for further selection in the Buckfast and Carnica breeding population, respectively.","PeriodicalId":106657,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Insect Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2023.1135187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The selection of honeybee strains resistant to the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is generally considered as one of the most sustainable ways of coping with this major bee parasite. Thus, breeding efforts increasingly focus on resistance parameters in addition to common beekeeping traits like honey yield and gentleness. In every breeding effort, the success strongly depends on the quantifiability and heritability of the traits accounted. To find the most suitable traits among the manifold variants to assess Varroa resistance, it is necessary to evaluate how easily a trait can be measured (i.e., testing effort) in relation to the underlying heritability (i.e., expected transfer to the following generation). Various possible selection traits are described as beneficial for colony survival in the presence of Varroa destructor and therefore are measured in breeding stocks around the globe. Two of them in particular, suppressed mite reproduction (SMR, sensu lato any reproductive failure of mother mites) and recapping of already sealed brood cells have recently gained increasing attention among the breeders because they closely resemble resistance mechanisms of some Varroa-surviving honeybee populations. However, it was still unknown whether the genetic background of the trait is sufficient for targeted selection. We therefore investigated the heritabilities and genetic correlations for SMR and REC, distinguishing between recapping of infested cells (RECinf) and all cells (RECall), on an extensive dataset of Buckfast and Carniolan stock in Germany. With an accessible h² of 0.18 and 0.44 for SMR and an accessible h² of 0.44 and 0.40 for RECinf, both traits turned out to be very promising for further selection in the Buckfast and Carnica breeding population, respectively.
选择抗外寄生瓦螨的蜜蜂品系被普遍认为是应对这一主要蜜蜂寄生虫的最可持续的方法之一。因此,除了常见的养蜂特性,如蜂蜜产量和温和性之外,育种工作越来越关注抗性参数。在每一次育种努力中,成功与否在很大程度上取决于性状的可量化性和遗传性。为了在众多变异中找到最合适的性状来评估抗瓦螨性,有必要评估一个性状与潜在遗传力(即预期向下一代的转移)的关系,有多容易被测量(即测试努力)。在毁灭瓦螨存在的情况下,各种可能的选择性状被描述为有利于群体生存,因此在全球的繁殖种群中进行了测量。其中,抑制螨的繁殖(SMR, sensu lato任何母螨的繁殖失败)和重新盖住已经封闭的育巢细胞最近引起了育种者越来越多的关注,因为它们与一些瓦螨存活的蜜蜂种群的抗性机制非常相似。然而,目前尚不清楚该性状的遗传背景是否足以进行靶向选择。因此,我们在德国Buckfast和Carniolan种群的广泛数据集上研究了SMR和REC的遗传力和遗传相关性,区分了侵染细胞(RECinf)和所有细胞(RECall)。SMR的可达h²分别为0.18和0.44,RECinf的可达h²分别为0.44和0.40,这两个性状在Buckfast和Carnica育种群体中具有很好的选择前景。