Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Long Polyetheretherketone Cage

C. Park, A. Anzar, Beom seok Yoo, Jae Eon Yoon, Jae Hyun Kim, W. Park
{"title":"Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Long Polyetheretherketone Cage","authors":"C. Park, A. Anzar, Beom seok Yoo, Jae Eon Yoon, Jae Hyun Kim, W. Park","doi":"10.21182/jmisst.2023.00745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: With the latest advances and innovations in field of spine surgery, the new generation of spine surgeons has been increasingly preferring the endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion technique to treat the pathology of lumbar degenerative disease. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a long polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.Methods: This study included 40 patients treated by biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a long PEEK cage between January 2020 and December 2021. The clinical evaluation was conducted using improvements in visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Radiological outcomes were evaluated by changes in disc height and segmental and lumbar lordosis. Fusion was assessed based on computed tomography scans using the Bridewell criteria. Surgical parameters (e.g., operative duration, blood loss and complications) were noted.Results: Of the 40 patients in this study, 13 were male and 27 were female. Most patients had significant clinical improvement as indicated by improvements in VAS and ODI scores (p < 0.05). Disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis showed significant improvements (p < 0.05). The mean surgical duration was 180 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 80 mL. All patients had grade 1 or 2 fusion.Conclusion: Biportal endoscopic fusion using a long PEEK cage is an excellent option for achieving good interbody fusion when indicated. A long-term follow-up study would be needed to fully clarify the effectiveness of this procedure.","PeriodicalId":405058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique","volume":"549 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2023.00745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: With the latest advances and innovations in field of spine surgery, the new generation of spine surgeons has been increasingly preferring the endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion technique to treat the pathology of lumbar degenerative disease. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a long polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.Methods: This study included 40 patients treated by biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a long PEEK cage between January 2020 and December 2021. The clinical evaluation was conducted using improvements in visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Radiological outcomes were evaluated by changes in disc height and segmental and lumbar lordosis. Fusion was assessed based on computed tomography scans using the Bridewell criteria. Surgical parameters (e.g., operative duration, blood loss and complications) were noted.Results: Of the 40 patients in this study, 13 were male and 27 were female. Most patients had significant clinical improvement as indicated by improvements in VAS and ODI scores (p < 0.05). Disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis showed significant improvements (p < 0.05). The mean surgical duration was 180 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 80 mL. All patients had grade 1 or 2 fusion.Conclusion: Biportal endoscopic fusion using a long PEEK cage is an excellent option for achieving good interbody fusion when indicated. A long-term follow-up study would be needed to fully clarify the effectiveness of this procedure.
双门静脉内镜下长聚醚醚酮笼腰椎椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果
目的:随着脊柱外科领域的最新进展和创新,新一代脊柱外科医生越来越倾向于采用内窥镜腰椎椎体间融合技术治疗腰椎退行性疾病。本研究的目的是阐明采用长聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼进行双门静脉内镜腰椎椎体间融合的临床和放射学结果。方法:本研究包括40例在2020年1月至2021年12月期间接受双门静脉内窥镜腰椎椎体间融合治疗的患者。通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分的改善进行临床评价。放射学结果通过椎间盘高度、节段性腰椎前凸的变化来评估。融合评估基于计算机断层扫描使用Bridewell标准。记录手术参数(如手术时间、出血量和并发症)。结果:本组40例患者中男性13例,女性27例。大多数患者的VAS和ODI评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。椎间盘高度、节段性前凸、腰椎前凸均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。平均手术时间为180分钟,平均失血量为80 mL。所有患者均为1级或2级融合。结论:双门静脉内窥镜融合使用长PEEK保持器是实现良好体间融合的极好选择。需要进行长期的后续研究,以充分阐明这一程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信