Implementation of Smoke Free-homes Rules in the Homes of Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status

M. Znyk, D. Kaleta
{"title":"Implementation of Smoke Free-homes Rules in the Homes of Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status","authors":"M. Znyk, D. Kaleta","doi":"10.36145/jhsm2021.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Private places such as homes are common places of exposure to secondhand smoke. Currently, more and more attention is being paid to reducing general and residential exposure to ETS (environmental tobacco smoke). The voluntary introduction of smoke-free homes (SFH) is a promising preventive measure in this regard. Most smoking households don’t implement comprehensive anti-smoking policies, and exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is still common among low socioeconomic populations and children. Aim The aim of the study was to assess exposure to passive smoking and to assess compliance with the rules of a smoke-free home in the homes of smokers with low socioeconomic status. Material and methods 117 smokers in Piotrków County were examined in 2015. The research tool was a questionnaire. The study received a positive opinion from the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/243/15/KE). Results People who respect the implementation of smoke free-homes rules in their homes accounted for 48.7% of the total number of respondents, of which 58% were women and 42% were men. They were mostly people aged 50 and more (54.3%), married (60%), with secondary education (33.3%), employed persons (70.2%), living at home with one adult (43.8%). 68.4% of the respondents advocating smoke-free homes have ever tried to quit, usually 1–2 times (38.6%). Fear of the disease (36.8%) and the wish of the family (29.8%) were the most frequently mentioned reasons that prompted the respondents to quit smoking in tobacco-free homes. In smoke-free homes, 82.5% of the guests complied with the accepted rules for smoking. Conclusions There is a need for interventions to encourage a smoking ban in homes. Primary care interventions, public health programs, and media campaigns should promote the health benefits of having a smoke-free home.","PeriodicalId":335287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Study and Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Study and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36145/jhsm2021.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Private places such as homes are common places of exposure to secondhand smoke. Currently, more and more attention is being paid to reducing general and residential exposure to ETS (environmental tobacco smoke). The voluntary introduction of smoke-free homes (SFH) is a promising preventive measure in this regard. Most smoking households don’t implement comprehensive anti-smoking policies, and exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is still common among low socioeconomic populations and children. Aim The aim of the study was to assess exposure to passive smoking and to assess compliance with the rules of a smoke-free home in the homes of smokers with low socioeconomic status. Material and methods 117 smokers in Piotrków County were examined in 2015. The research tool was a questionnaire. The study received a positive opinion from the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/243/15/KE). Results People who respect the implementation of smoke free-homes rules in their homes accounted for 48.7% of the total number of respondents, of which 58% were women and 42% were men. They were mostly people aged 50 and more (54.3%), married (60%), with secondary education (33.3%), employed persons (70.2%), living at home with one adult (43.8%). 68.4% of the respondents advocating smoke-free homes have ever tried to quit, usually 1–2 times (38.6%). Fear of the disease (36.8%) and the wish of the family (29.8%) were the most frequently mentioned reasons that prompted the respondents to quit smoking in tobacco-free homes. In smoke-free homes, 82.5% of the guests complied with the accepted rules for smoking. Conclusions There is a need for interventions to encourage a smoking ban in homes. Primary care interventions, public health programs, and media campaigns should promote the health benefits of having a smoke-free home.
社会经济地位低的吸烟者家庭实施无烟家庭规则
家庭等私人场所是暴露于二手烟的常见场所。目前,人们越来越重视减少一般和居住环境中烟草烟雾的暴露。在这方面,自愿推行无烟家居是一项很有希望的预防措施。大多数吸烟家庭没有实施全面的禁烟政策,二手烟暴露在低社会经济人群和儿童中仍然很普遍。目的本研究的目的是评估被动吸烟的暴露情况,以及评估社会经济地位低的吸烟者对无烟家庭规则的遵守情况。材料与方法对2015年Piotrków县117名吸烟者进行调查。研究工具是问卷调查。这项研究得到了罗兹医科大学生物伦理委员会(RNN/243/15/KE)的积极评价。结果尊重家中无烟规定执行情况的受访者占受访者总数的48.7%,其中女性占58%,男性占42%。他们大多年龄在50岁或以上(54.3%),已婚(60%),受过中等教育(33.3%),有工作(70.2%),与一名成年人同住(43.8%)。68.4%倡导无烟家庭的受访者曾尝试戒烟,通常为1-2次(38.6%)。对疾病的恐惧(36.8%)和家人的愿望(29.8%)是促使受访者在无烟家庭中戒烟的最常见原因。在无烟家庭中,82.5%的客人遵守了公认的吸烟规定。结论:有必要采取干预措施鼓励家庭禁烟。初级保健干预措施、公共卫生计划和媒体宣传活动应促进无烟家庭对健康的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信