Hardness of constant-round communication complexity

Shuichi Hirahara, Rahul Ilango, B. Loff
{"title":"Hardness of constant-round communication complexity","authors":"Shuichi Hirahara, Rahul Ilango, B. Loff","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How difficult is it to compute the communication complexity of a two-argument total Boolean function f : [N] X [N] → {0, 1}, when it is given as an N X N binary matrix? In 2009, Kushilevitz and Weinreb showed that this problem is cryptographically hard, but it is still open whether it is NP-hard. In this work, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the size (number of leaves) of the smallest constant-round protocol for a two-argument total Boolean function f : [N] X [N] → {0, 1}, when it is given as an N X N binary matrix. Along the way to proving this, we show a new deterministic variant of the round elimination lemma, which may be of independent interest.","PeriodicalId":336911,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 36th Computational Complexity Conference","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 36th Computational Complexity Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How difficult is it to compute the communication complexity of a two-argument total Boolean function f : [N] X [N] → {0, 1}, when it is given as an N X N binary matrix? In 2009, Kushilevitz and Weinreb showed that this problem is cryptographically hard, but it is still open whether it is NP-hard. In this work, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the size (number of leaves) of the smallest constant-round protocol for a two-argument total Boolean function f : [N] X [N] → {0, 1}, when it is given as an N X N binary matrix. Along the way to proving this, we show a new deterministic variant of the round elimination lemma, which may be of independent interest.
恒轮通信复杂度的硬度
计算两个参数的布尔函数f: [N] X [N]→{0,1}的通信复杂度有多困难,当它以N X N二进制矩阵给出时?2009年,Kushilevitz和Weinreb证明了这个问题在密码学上是困难的,但它是否是np困难仍然是开放的。在这项工作中,我们证明了对于两个参数的全布尔函数f: [N] X [N]→{0,1},当它被给定为N X N二进制矩阵时,它是np困难的,以近似最小的常轮协议的大小(叶数)。在证明这一点的过程中,我们给出了圆消引理的一个新的确定性变体,它可能具有独立的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信