The Survival Of All Ceramic Crowns With A Zirconia Core (Lava™)

Gang wei, J. Dai, Ling Xiao, Chen Dong, Fei Liu
{"title":"The Survival Of All Ceramic Crowns With A Zirconia Core (Lava™)","authors":"Gang wei, J. Dai, Ling Xiao, Chen Dong, Fei Liu","doi":"10.31579/jdos.2019/011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Few studies have assessed the survival of restorations and particularly zirconia based crowns in the restoration of the severely worn dentition. This study aimed to determine survival and factors associated with failure in anterior teeth worn through to dentine restored with Lava™ crowns. Methods: A convenience sample of 30 participants (27 male, 3 female) had 161 Lava™ crowns placed by one specialist clinician in a hospital setting. Follow-up was over a median 72 month period. Results: Of the 161 Lava™ crowns only 25 failed (15.5%) in 15 individuals up to 84 months for the longest case. Major failures were total debond (N=7) or minor delamination chips within the veneer ceramic layer (N=18). The mean time to first failure was 25.23 months. The Kaplan Meier survival plot estimated the Mean Survival Time for the crowns to be 74 months (95%CI 70.4, 77.3). Failures by subject were not associated with an increase in Occlusal Vertical Dimension using a Dahl approach but were associated with an edge-to-edge incisal relation (p<0.05), attrition (p<0.05) and bruxism (p<0.005). Conclusion: The Kaplan Meier survival plot estimated the Mean Survival Time for the crowns to be 74 months. The high loads in bruxism result in increased risk of fracture or debond. Clinical relevance: A protective bi-laminar splint is thus advisable. Nonetheless, application of zirconia based crowns in a difficult clinical situation such as bruxism can be a successful treatment modality.","PeriodicalId":320549,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/jdos.2019/011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have assessed the survival of restorations and particularly zirconia based crowns in the restoration of the severely worn dentition. This study aimed to determine survival and factors associated with failure in anterior teeth worn through to dentine restored with Lava™ crowns. Methods: A convenience sample of 30 participants (27 male, 3 female) had 161 Lava™ crowns placed by one specialist clinician in a hospital setting. Follow-up was over a median 72 month period. Results: Of the 161 Lava™ crowns only 25 failed (15.5%) in 15 individuals up to 84 months for the longest case. Major failures were total debond (N=7) or minor delamination chips within the veneer ceramic layer (N=18). The mean time to first failure was 25.23 months. The Kaplan Meier survival plot estimated the Mean Survival Time for the crowns to be 74 months (95%CI 70.4, 77.3). Failures by subject were not associated with an increase in Occlusal Vertical Dimension using a Dahl approach but were associated with an edge-to-edge incisal relation (p<0.05), attrition (p<0.05) and bruxism (p<0.005). Conclusion: The Kaplan Meier survival plot estimated the Mean Survival Time for the crowns to be 74 months. The high loads in bruxism result in increased risk of fracture or debond. Clinical relevance: A protective bi-laminar splint is thus advisable. Nonetheless, application of zirconia based crowns in a difficult clinical situation such as bruxism can be a successful treatment modality.
所有带有氧化锆芯(Lava™)的陶瓷冠的存活
背景:很少有研究评估修复体的存活率,特别是氧化锆基冠修复严重磨损的牙列。本研究旨在确定使用Lava™冠修复牙本质的前牙的存活率和相关因素。方法:30名参与者(27名男性,3名女性)在医院由一名专业临床医生放置了161个Lava™冠。随访时间中位数为72个月。结果:在161个Lava™冠中,15个人中只有25个(15.5%)失败,最长的病例持续84个月。主要故障为全脱落(N=7)或单板陶瓷层内的轻微脱层芯片(N=18)。首次失败的平均时间为25.23个月。Kaplan Meier生存图估计冠的平均生存时间为74个月(95%CI 70.4, 77.3)。受试者的失败与使用Dahl入路时咬合垂直尺寸的增加无关,但与边缘对边缘切牙关系(p<0.05)、磨耗(p<0.05)和磨牙(p<0.005)相关。结论:Kaplan Meier生存图估计冠的平均生存时间为74个月。磨牙症的高负荷导致骨折或脱粘的风险增加。临床相关性:保护性双板夹板是可取的。尽管如此,在临床困难的情况下,如磨牙,应用氧化锆基冠可以是一种成功的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信