America’s Failing Trade War With China: A Focus on Fentanyl

Corinna K. Hamilton
{"title":"America’s Failing Trade War With China: A Focus on Fentanyl","authors":"Corinna K. Hamilton","doi":"10.18034/AJTP.V8I1.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As this article will explain in detail, much of the fentanyl reaching the hands of Americans comes from The People’s Republic of China (“China”). However, as seen by the rise in overdoses, most efforts to control the invasion of fentanyl have been unsuccessful. Although the federal and state governments have attempted to curtail this crisis by imposing sanctions and urging China to regulate the production and shipping of the substance, fentanyl continues to flood the streets of the U.S. Moreover, the economic interdependence between the two nations complicates the matter. Because of this interdependence, the U.S. must take control of the situation. The U.S. fentanyl problem will persist if Americans are not dissuaded from using the drug. We must focus on the demand, rather than the supply. This comment focuses on the rise of opioids and synthetic pain relievers, and the variety of attempts at decreasing the number of addicts and overdoses. Initially, the comment will discuss the history of the popular drug opium, opiates, and prescription opioids, discussing state and federal attempts at curbing the crisis that the U.S. faces. It will address the rise of synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, and how and why it was created. Section two will discuss how fentanyl and its precursors are imported into the U.S. from China. Section three will discuss U.S. federal and state attempts at legislation to control the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. Section four will address the implications, or perhaps fuel to the fire, that the influx in the supply of fentanyl from China has had on trade relations, and how the trade linkage between the two nations obfuscates the situation. The comment will conclude by hypothesizing how the U.S. and China will recalibrate their relationship and recommend that to combat the fentanyl emergency, the U.S. needs to take steps to offer Americans with drug addictions the assistance they need.","PeriodicalId":433827,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Trade and Policy","volume":"340 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Trade and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18034/AJTP.V8I1.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As this article will explain in detail, much of the fentanyl reaching the hands of Americans comes from The People’s Republic of China (“China”). However, as seen by the rise in overdoses, most efforts to control the invasion of fentanyl have been unsuccessful. Although the federal and state governments have attempted to curtail this crisis by imposing sanctions and urging China to regulate the production and shipping of the substance, fentanyl continues to flood the streets of the U.S. Moreover, the economic interdependence between the two nations complicates the matter. Because of this interdependence, the U.S. must take control of the situation. The U.S. fentanyl problem will persist if Americans are not dissuaded from using the drug. We must focus on the demand, rather than the supply. This comment focuses on the rise of opioids and synthetic pain relievers, and the variety of attempts at decreasing the number of addicts and overdoses. Initially, the comment will discuss the history of the popular drug opium, opiates, and prescription opioids, discussing state and federal attempts at curbing the crisis that the U.S. faces. It will address the rise of synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, and how and why it was created. Section two will discuss how fentanyl and its precursors are imported into the U.S. from China. Section three will discuss U.S. federal and state attempts at legislation to control the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. Section four will address the implications, or perhaps fuel to the fire, that the influx in the supply of fentanyl from China has had on trade relations, and how the trade linkage between the two nations obfuscates the situation. The comment will conclude by hypothesizing how the U.S. and China will recalibrate their relationship and recommend that to combat the fentanyl emergency, the U.S. needs to take steps to offer Americans with drug addictions the assistance they need.
美国与中国的贸易战失败:关注芬太尼
正如本文将详细解释的那样,美国人手中的大部分芬太尼来自中华人民共和国(“中国”)。然而,从过量用药的增加可以看出,大多数控制芬太尼入侵的努力都没有成功。尽管联邦政府和州政府试图通过制裁和敦促中国规范芬太尼的生产和运输来遏制这一危机,但芬太尼继续充斥着美国的街头。此外,两国之间的经济相互依存使问题复杂化。由于这种相互依赖,美国必须控制局势。如果不劝阻美国人使用芬太尼,美国的芬太尼问题将持续存在。我们必须关注需求,而不是供应。这篇评论的重点是阿片类药物和合成止痛药的增加,以及减少成瘾者和过量服用人数的各种尝试。首先,这篇评论将讨论流行药物鸦片、阿片类药物和处方阿片类药物的历史,讨论各州和联邦政府为遏制美国面临的危机所做的努力。它将解决芬太尼等合成阿片类药物的崛起,以及它是如何以及为什么被创造出来的。第二部分将讨论芬太尼及其前体如何从中国进口到美国。第三部分将讨论美国联邦和各州试图通过立法来控制芬太尼流入美国。第四部分将讨论从中国涌入的芬太尼供应对贸易关系的影响,以及两国之间的贸易联系如何混淆了形势。这篇评论的最后将假设美国和中国将如何重新调整他们的关系,并建议为了应对芬太尼的紧急情况,美国需要采取措施,向有毒瘾的美国人提供他们所需要的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信