Hermeneutic

{"title":"Hermeneutic","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvt9k671.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So far we have considered the general forms taken by the commerce between author, reader, and text, but not the figures who make romantic hermeneutics different from its precursors . The history of hermeneutics from Schleiermacher to Dilthey is the history of an expan­ sion of the field of study to include not only biblical and secular texts but all human phenomena-from texts to gestures and actions-that use sensory signs to convey an inner spiritual reality . 1 This expansion has consequences for modern semiotics that will not be pursued here, for the romantic period initiates an awareness of empirical 'realities' as tex­ tual phenomena. But it is the increasing sense that signs may not ade­ quately convey interiority that will be the concern of this chapter. To begin with, this inadequacy is the product of a temporal distance be­ tween author and reader that we can overcome through a process of historical reconstruction or re-experiencing (Nacherleben) . 2 More and more, however, the inner meaning of a text is deferred to the future and becomes something to be projected rather than recovered by the reader. This chapter traces the movement from a positive hermeneutics that deepens or completes the text to a negative hermeneutics that resists it. It follows this movement through the work of Schleiermacher and oth­ ers to that of Hegel, which stands ambiguously on the borderline be­ tween the two varieties of hermeneutics, and finally to the work of","PeriodicalId":176001,"journal":{"name":"Songs of Nature","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Songs of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k671.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

So far we have considered the general forms taken by the commerce between author, reader, and text, but not the figures who make romantic hermeneutics different from its precursors . The history of hermeneutics from Schleiermacher to Dilthey is the history of an expan­ sion of the field of study to include not only biblical and secular texts but all human phenomena-from texts to gestures and actions-that use sensory signs to convey an inner spiritual reality . 1 This expansion has consequences for modern semiotics that will not be pursued here, for the romantic period initiates an awareness of empirical 'realities' as tex­ tual phenomena. But it is the increasing sense that signs may not ade­ quately convey interiority that will be the concern of this chapter. To begin with, this inadequacy is the product of a temporal distance be­ tween author and reader that we can overcome through a process of historical reconstruction or re-experiencing (Nacherleben) . 2 More and more, however, the inner meaning of a text is deferred to the future and becomes something to be projected rather than recovered by the reader. This chapter traces the movement from a positive hermeneutics that deepens or completes the text to a negative hermeneutics that resists it. It follows this movement through the work of Schleiermacher and oth­ ers to that of Hegel, which stands ambiguously on the borderline be­ tween the two varieties of hermeneutics, and finally to the work of
解释学
到目前为止,我们已经考虑了作者、读者和文本之间交易的一般形式,但还没有考虑使浪漫主义解释学与其前身不同的人物。从施莱尔马赫(Schleiermacher)到狄尔泰(Dilthey),解释学的历史是研究领域的扩展史,不仅包括圣经和世俗文本,还包括所有人类现象——从文本到手势和动作——这些现象使用感官符号来传达内在的精神现实。这种扩展对现代符号学产生了影响,这里不进行讨论,因为浪漫主义时期开启了对经验“现实”作为文本现象的认识。但是,越来越多的人意识到,符号可能不能充分地传达内在,这将是本章所关注的。首先,这种不足是作者和读者之间时间距离的产物,我们可以通过历史重建或重新体验的过程来克服这种距离(Nacherleben)。然而,越来越多的文本的内在意义被推迟到未来,成为一种需要投射而不是由读者恢复的东西。本章追溯了从深化或完善文本的积极解释学到抵制文本的消极解释学的运动。从施莱尔马赫和其他人的著作到黑格尔的著作,黑格尔模棱两可地站在两种解释学的边界上,最后到黑格尔的著作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信