{"title":"May Fourth and Postwar Hong Kong’s Leftist Cantonese Cinema","authors":"J. Chang","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvfxv91t.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 examines the legacy of the May Fourth Movement in the context of postwar Hong Kong’s golden age of cinema. It argues that the May Fourth project was an unfinished one and was carried forward by progressive Cantonese filmmakers who were the torchbearers of its ideology. This chapter focuses on the careers of left-leaning filmmakers such as Ng Cho-fan, one of the founders of the Union Film Enterprise Ltd., and their emergence as postwar Hong Kong’s new cultural elites. Through a close reading of Union’s film adaptations of the Ba Jin trilogy, Family (Jia, dir. Ng Wu, 1953), Spring (Chun, dir. Lee Sun-fung, 1953), and Autumn (Qiu, dir. Chun Kim, 1954), this chapter demonstrates the transformative nature of the moral message of postwar Hong Kong’s cultural elites. Not only did left-leaning film talent repurpose core tenets of May Fourth, they also sought to reinterpret the spirit of vernacular modernism for the colony’s audiences through their film productions. Although May Fourth precepts were brought to Hong Kong by China’s nanlai cultural elites and leftwing film talents, the May Fourth spirit underwent a creative translingual appropriation during the 1950s as local Hong Kong leftwing companies such as the Union and Xinlian emerged.","PeriodicalId":207996,"journal":{"name":"Screening Communities","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Screening Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvfxv91t.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter 3 examines the legacy of the May Fourth Movement in the context of postwar Hong Kong’s golden age of cinema. It argues that the May Fourth project was an unfinished one and was carried forward by progressive Cantonese filmmakers who were the torchbearers of its ideology. This chapter focuses on the careers of left-leaning filmmakers such as Ng Cho-fan, one of the founders of the Union Film Enterprise Ltd., and their emergence as postwar Hong Kong’s new cultural elites. Through a close reading of Union’s film adaptations of the Ba Jin trilogy, Family (Jia, dir. Ng Wu, 1953), Spring (Chun, dir. Lee Sun-fung, 1953), and Autumn (Qiu, dir. Chun Kim, 1954), this chapter demonstrates the transformative nature of the moral message of postwar Hong Kong’s cultural elites. Not only did left-leaning film talent repurpose core tenets of May Fourth, they also sought to reinterpret the spirit of vernacular modernism for the colony’s audiences through their film productions. Although May Fourth precepts were brought to Hong Kong by China’s nanlai cultural elites and leftwing film talents, the May Fourth spirit underwent a creative translingual appropriation during the 1950s as local Hong Kong leftwing companies such as the Union and Xinlian emerged.
第三章在战后香港电影黄金时代的背景下考察五四运动的遗产。它认为,五四项目是一个未完成的项目,由进步的广东电影制片人继续推进,他们是五四意识形态的火炬手。这一章的重点是左倾电影人的职业生涯,如吴卓凡,联合电影企业有限公司的创始人之一,以及他们作为战后香港新文化精英的出现。通过对联合电影公司改编的《巴金三部曲》的仔细阅读,贾樟柯导演的《家》(Family)。吴武,1953),春(春,导演)。李舜丰,1953)和秋(秋,导演。Chun Kim, 1954),这一章展示了战后香港文化精英的道德信息的变革性。左倾的电影人才不仅重新诠释了五四的核心原则,他们还试图通过他们的电影作品为殖民地的观众重新诠释乡土现代主义的精神。虽然五四格言是由中国的南来文化精英和左翼电影人才带到香港的,但五四精神在20世纪50年代,随着香港本土左翼公司如联和新联的出现,经历了一次创造性的翻译挪用。