Analysing the Problem of Minority Awards in India

Aditya Chauhan
{"title":"Analysing the Problem of Minority Awards in India","authors":"Aditya Chauhan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3879125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of upholding minority awards is not only on a completely different footing than partly severing and upholding the arbitral award, but also fails to provide a legal basis under the provisions of the Arbitration Act or any legal jurisprudence. The minority views are coloured as “arbitral awards”, which gives a false impression of party autonomy still being present in such a determination. This problem is more cantered on the approach of the courts, and has to be resolved by suitable judicial pronouncements. If it goes unchecked, it would threaten to defeat the very purpose arbitration by opening a Pandora’s box. This article analyses the problem of upholding minority awards in light of the Indian court judgments.","PeriodicalId":228141,"journal":{"name":"India Law eJournal","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3879125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of upholding minority awards is not only on a completely different footing than partly severing and upholding the arbitral award, but also fails to provide a legal basis under the provisions of the Arbitration Act or any legal jurisprudence. The minority views are coloured as “arbitral awards”, which gives a false impression of party autonomy still being present in such a determination. This problem is more cantered on the approach of the courts, and has to be resolved by suitable judicial pronouncements. If it goes unchecked, it would threaten to defeat the very purpose arbitration by opening a Pandora’s box. This article analyses the problem of upholding minority awards in light of the Indian court judgments.
分析印度少数民族奖的问题
维持少数人裁决的做法不仅与部分切断和维持仲裁裁决的立足点完全不同,而且也没有提供《仲裁法》或任何法理规定的法律依据。少数人的观点被粉饰成“仲裁裁决”,这给人一种错误的印象,即在这样的裁决中仍然存在当事人的自主权。这个问题更多地集中在法院的做法上,必须通过适当的司法声明来解决。如果不加以控制,它将打开潘多拉的盒子,威胁到目的仲裁的失败。本文结合印度法院的判决,分析了维护少数人赔偿的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信