Stock Market Synchronicity – An Alternative Approach to Assessing the Information Impact of Australian IFRS

S. Bissessur, A. Hodgson
{"title":"Stock Market Synchronicity – An Alternative Approach to Assessing the Information Impact of Australian IFRS","authors":"S. Bissessur, A. Hodgson","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00388.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How has the mandatory adoption in 2005 of International Financial Reporting Standards in (IFRS) affected information flow for investors in Australia? This paper investigates impact by examining synchronicity issues. Morck et al. (2000) label the degree to which stock prices depend upon market and industry wide information as market synchronicity, and the degree to which they reflect firm specific information as idiosyncratic dependency. Increased synchronicity can signal several events, including a loss of confidence in firm specific accounting data, reduced transparency, or evidence of a greater degree of cross sectional comparability. We develop and test three theoretical models on the impact of IFRS and find a general decrease in synchronicity in the first two post‐IFRS years, followed by a reversion to a significantly higher level in later years. Further tests reveal lower analyst forecast earnings errors post‐IFRS. Results provide restrictive support for the International Accounting Standards Board contention that IFRS accounting provides higher specific and comparable information content – at least for sophisticated financial analysts.","PeriodicalId":134477,"journal":{"name":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00388.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

How has the mandatory adoption in 2005 of International Financial Reporting Standards in (IFRS) affected information flow for investors in Australia? This paper investigates impact by examining synchronicity issues. Morck et al. (2000) label the degree to which stock prices depend upon market and industry wide information as market synchronicity, and the degree to which they reflect firm specific information as idiosyncratic dependency. Increased synchronicity can signal several events, including a loss of confidence in firm specific accounting data, reduced transparency, or evidence of a greater degree of cross sectional comparability. We develop and test three theoretical models on the impact of IFRS and find a general decrease in synchronicity in the first two post‐IFRS years, followed by a reversion to a significantly higher level in later years. Further tests reveal lower analyst forecast earnings errors post‐IFRS. Results provide restrictive support for the International Accounting Standards Board contention that IFRS accounting provides higher specific and comparable information content – at least for sophisticated financial analysts.
股票市场同步性——评估澳大利亚国际财务报告准则信息影响的另一种方法
2005年强制采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS)对澳大利亚投资者的信息流动有何影响?本文通过考察同步性问题来研究影响。莫克等人(2000)将股票价格对市场和行业信息的依赖程度标记为市场同步性,将它们反映公司特定信息的程度标记为特质依赖性。同步性的增加可能预示着几个事件,包括对公司特定会计数据的信心丧失,透明度降低,或证据表明更大程度的横向可比性。我们开发并测试了三个关于国际财务报告准则影响的理论模型,发现在采用国际财务报告准则后的前两年,同步性普遍下降,随后在随后的几年中回归到显著更高的水平。进一步的测试显示较低的分析师预测收益误差后的国际财务报告准则。结果为国际会计准则理事会的论点提供了限制性支持,即国际财务报告准则会计提供了更高的具体和可比的信息内容-至少对资深的金融分析师而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信