Comparative study on Kirschner-wire and screw fixation for intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head

Jin Soo Kim, Jae Yong Lee, Dong Chul Lee, S. Roh, K. Lee, S. Koh
{"title":"Comparative study on Kirschner-wire and screw fixation for intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head","authors":"Jin Soo Kim, Jae Yong Lee, Dong Chul Lee, S. Roh, K. Lee, S. Koh","doi":"10.12790/ahm.22.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study compared screw and Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation for intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head regarding the success of union and functional outcomes.Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with closed intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalangeal head treated between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients with open wounds, tendon or neurovascular injuries, comminuted fractures, or middle phalangeal fractures were excluded. Patients’ demographics, bone union, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint range of motion (ROM), grip power, and complications were collected and analyzed. The percentage of intra-articular surface involvement and the number of bone fragments were also analyzed in relation to the functional results.Results: Among 41 patients, 21 were managed with screw fixation, and the remaining 20 with K-wire fixation. The mean union rate was 100% in the screw fixation group and 95.0% in the K-wire fixation group, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.488). Other functional parameters (PIP joint ROM, time to bone union, and grip power) were not significantly different between the two groups. Regardless of the treatment modality, the PIP joint ROM showed significant negative associations with the involvement of more intra-articular surfaces (p<0.001) and the presence of a greater number of bone fragments (p=0.040).Conclusion: In intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head, the treatment modality (screw or K-wire) did not affect the treatment outcome. Instead, the percentage of intra-articular surface involvement and the number of bone fragments showed significant negative associations with the PIP joint ROM after treatment.","PeriodicalId":137349,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.22.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared screw and Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation for intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head regarding the success of union and functional outcomes.Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with closed intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalangeal head treated between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients with open wounds, tendon or neurovascular injuries, comminuted fractures, or middle phalangeal fractures were excluded. Patients’ demographics, bone union, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint range of motion (ROM), grip power, and complications were collected and analyzed. The percentage of intra-articular surface involvement and the number of bone fragments were also analyzed in relation to the functional results.Results: Among 41 patients, 21 were managed with screw fixation, and the remaining 20 with K-wire fixation. The mean union rate was 100% in the screw fixation group and 95.0% in the K-wire fixation group, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.488). Other functional parameters (PIP joint ROM, time to bone union, and grip power) were not significantly different between the two groups. Regardless of the treatment modality, the PIP joint ROM showed significant negative associations with the involvement of more intra-articular surfaces (p<0.001) and the presence of a greater number of bone fragments (p=0.040).Conclusion: In intra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx head, the treatment modality (screw or K-wire) did not affect the treatment outcome. Instead, the percentage of intra-articular surface involvement and the number of bone fragments showed significant negative associations with the PIP joint ROM after treatment.
克氏针与螺钉固定治疗近端指骨头关节内骨折的比较研究
目的:本研究比较螺钉和克氏针(k -丝)固定治疗近端指骨头关节内骨折的成功愈合和功能结果。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们招募了2011年1月至2021年12月期间治疗的指骨近端闭合性关节内骨折患者。排除开放性伤口、肌腱或神经血管损伤、粉碎性骨折或中指骨骨折的患者。收集并分析患者的人口统计学、骨愈合、近端指间关节活动度(PIP)、握力及并发症。关节内表面受累的百分比和骨碎片的数量也与功能结果进行了分析。结果:41例患者中21例采用螺钉固定,20例采用k线固定。螺钉固定组平均愈合率为100%,k针固定组平均愈合率为95.0%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.488)。其他功能参数(PIP关节ROM,骨愈合时间,握力)在两组之间无显著差异。无论采用何种治疗方式,PIP关节ROM与更多关节内表面受损伤(p<0.001)和更多骨碎片的存在(p=0.040)呈显著负相关。结论:近端指骨头关节内骨折的治疗方式(螺钉或k针)不影响治疗效果。相反,关节表面受累率和骨碎片数量与治疗后PIP关节ROM呈显著负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信