NFDI4Energy Case-Study: Comparative Analysis and Visualisation of Long-Term Energy System Scenarios

Mirko Schäfer, Ramiz Qussous, Ludwig Hülk, Johan Lilliestam, Anke Weidlich
{"title":"NFDI4Energy Case-Study: Comparative Analysis and Visualisation of Long-Term Energy System Scenarios","authors":"Mirko Schäfer, Ramiz Qussous, Ludwig Hülk, Johan Lilliestam, Anke Weidlich","doi":"10.52825/cordi.v1i.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis and comparison of energy system scenarios provide valuable insights into potential transformation pathways. These studies on long-term developments can serve as new inputs for scientific research and decision-making processes, providing policymakers and other stakeholders with the necessary guidance to achieve sustainable energy systems. Generally, such scenarios are derived from energy system models which often seek a cost-optimal system design under a variety of boundary conditions, ranging from technical constraints to limits of land availability or a cap on overall greenhouse gas emissions [1]. For Germany, several larger energy system scenario studies have been published, addressing the goal of carbon neutrality in 2045 as prescribed in the German climate protection act [2]. These studies show differences in their specific methodology, sector representation, parameter settings or, more generally, overall scenario narratives. This diversity represents a challenge regarding the comparability of these studies, and consequently the ability to identify consensus and controversies in their findings. Often only limited access to data for parameter settings and scenario results is provided. Almost always the data is presented in different detail and formats, thus imposing further barriers for comparison and usability for the scientific community [3].\nAs one of the three use cases applied in Task Area 6 of the NFDI4Energy research project, we aim to address this challenge by providing transparent and open comparative information and data on long-term energy system scenarios. Selected scenarios for the transition towards a climate-neutral Germany will be annotated with terms form the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) [4]. The comparison is building on an already existing database infrastructure from the Open Energy Platform (OEP) [5]. Existing concepts for qualitative and quantitative comparisons will be used and improved to cover a wide range of existing energy system studies.","PeriodicalId":359879,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Conference on Research Data Infrastructure","volume":"60 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Conference on Research Data Infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52825/cordi.v1i.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Analysis and comparison of energy system scenarios provide valuable insights into potential transformation pathways. These studies on long-term developments can serve as new inputs for scientific research and decision-making processes, providing policymakers and other stakeholders with the necessary guidance to achieve sustainable energy systems. Generally, such scenarios are derived from energy system models which often seek a cost-optimal system design under a variety of boundary conditions, ranging from technical constraints to limits of land availability or a cap on overall greenhouse gas emissions [1]. For Germany, several larger energy system scenario studies have been published, addressing the goal of carbon neutrality in 2045 as prescribed in the German climate protection act [2]. These studies show differences in their specific methodology, sector representation, parameter settings or, more generally, overall scenario narratives. This diversity represents a challenge regarding the comparability of these studies, and consequently the ability to identify consensus and controversies in their findings. Often only limited access to data for parameter settings and scenario results is provided. Almost always the data is presented in different detail and formats, thus imposing further barriers for comparison and usability for the scientific community [3]. As one of the three use cases applied in Task Area 6 of the NFDI4Energy research project, we aim to address this challenge by providing transparent and open comparative information and data on long-term energy system scenarios. Selected scenarios for the transition towards a climate-neutral Germany will be annotated with terms form the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) [4]. The comparison is building on an already existing database infrastructure from the Open Energy Platform (OEP) [5]. Existing concepts for qualitative and quantitative comparisons will be used and improved to cover a wide range of existing energy system studies.
nfdi4能源案例研究:长期能源系统情景的比较分析和可视化
能源系统方案的分析和比较为潜在的转型途径提供了有价值的见解。这些关于长期发展的研究可以作为科学研究和决策过程的新投入,为决策者和其他利益相关者提供实现可持续能源系统的必要指导。一般来说,这些情景来自能源系统模型,这些模型通常在各种边界条件下寻求成本最优的系统设计,从技术约束到土地可用性的限制或总体温室气体排放的上限[1]。对于德国,已经发表了几项更大的能源系统情景研究,解决了德国气候保护法中规定的到2045年实现碳中和的目标[2]。这些研究在具体方法、部门代表性、参数设置或更普遍的总体情景叙述方面存在差异。这种多样性代表了对这些研究的可比性的挑战,因此在他们的发现中识别共识和争议的能力。通常只提供对参数设置和场景结果数据的有限访问。数据几乎总是以不同的细节和格式呈现,从而给科学界的比较和可用性带来了进一步的障碍[3]。作为NFDI4Energy研究项目任务区域6中应用的三个用例之一,我们的目标是通过提供透明和开放的长期能源系统方案的比较信息和数据来解决这一挑战。向气候中性德国过渡的选定情景将使用开放能源本体(OEO)中的术语进行注释[4]。这种比较是建立在开放能源平台(OEP)已有的数据库基础设施上[5]。将利用和改进现有的质量和数量比较概念,以涵盖广泛的现有能源系统研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信