Tracing Buried Fracture Zones Using by Geological and Geophysical Methods in Microzoning: Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey) Case

Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium Pub Date : 2020-04-12 DOI:10.21467/abstracts.93.44

M. Hancer, E. Akyol, A. Aydin

{"title":"Tracing Buried Fracture Zones Using by Geological and Geophysical Methods in Microzoning: Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey) Case","authors":"M. Hancer, E. Akyol, A. Aydin","doi":"10.21467/abstracts.93.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book DOI: 10.21467/abstracts.93 Figure 2. Fracture map of the region (yellow lines: faults, red lines: geophysical cross sections, white lines: opening structures) Figure 3. Geophysical cross sections (multielektrode of resistivity) Conclusions. Eight faults have been identified in the study area and ten geophysical multiple electrode method sections have been taken and interpreted to determine their routes. The invisible opening structures detected by geophysical cross sections 6 and 8. All of these structures form a basis for land use and settlement suitability. References Emre, Ö., Duman, T. Y., Özalp, S., Elmacı 2011, 1:250.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Diri Fay Haritası Serisi, Denizli (NJ 35-12) Paftası, Seri No:12, MadenTetkikveArama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara-Türkiye. Hançer M. & Akyol E., 2019, Examination of Faults by Geophysical and Tectonic Methods and Paleoseismological Interpretation: Karahasanli-Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey) Case. International Journal of Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJASEAT), 7, 4/3, 4-7.","PeriodicalId":176768,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21467/abstracts.93.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Book DOI: 10.21467/abstracts.93 Figure 2. Fracture map of the region (yellow lines: faults, red lines: geophysical cross sections, white lines: opening structures) Figure 3. Geophysical cross sections (multielektrode of resistivity) Conclusions. Eight faults have been identified in the study area and ten geophysical multiple electrode method sections have been taken and interpreted to determine their routes. The invisible opening structures detected by geophysical cross sections 6 and 8. All of these structures form a basis for land use and settlement suitability. References Emre, Ö., Duman, T. Y., Özalp, S., Elmacı 2011, 1:250.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Diri Fay Haritası Serisi, Denizli (NJ 35-12) Paftası, Seri No:12, MadenTetkikveArama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara-Türkiye. Hançer M. & Akyol E., 2019, Examination of Faults by Geophysical and Tectonic Methods and Paleoseismological Interpretation: Karahasanli-Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey) Case. International Journal of Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJASEAT), 7, 4/3, 4-7.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用地质和地球物理方法追踪微分区中的隐伏裂缝带:Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey)案例

图书DOI: 10.21467/abstract .93图2。区域裂缝图(黄线为断层，红线为地球物理剖面，白线为开口构造)地球物理截面(多电极电阻率)在研究区内已确定了8条断层，并对10条地球物理多电极法剖面进行了解释，以确定断层的走向。地球物理截面6和8探测到的看不见的开口结构。所有这些结构构成了土地利用和定居适宜性的基础。参考资料Emre， Ö。，杜曼，T. Y.， Özalp, S.， elmacye 2011, 1:25 .000 Ölçekli t rkiye Diri Fay haritaski Serisi, Denizli (NJ 35-12) paftasyi, Seri No . 12, MadenTetkikveArama Genel Müdürlüğü， ankara - trkiye。hanprer M. & Akyol E.， 2019，地球物理和构造方法检测断层及古地震学解释:Karahasanli-Kayakoy (Denizli-Turkey)案例。科学进展与工程技术学报(自然科学版)，2008,4 /3,4-7。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium

自引率

0.00%

发文量