'The Past Never Vanishes': A Contextual Critique of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine

Lorie Graham
{"title":"'The Past Never Vanishes': A Contextual Critique of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine","authors":"Lorie Graham","doi":"10.2307/20068871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I don't know my own culture, . . . I am going to need your help in understanding . . . . Teach me, teach my children. These are the words of a forty-three-year-old Navajo woman on her first visit back to the Navajo Nation since her birth. Stolen as an infant, along with her twin brother, and adopted out on the black market, she was finally reunited with her family and community. Her journey home comes at a time when Native American nations are fighting proposed legislation and court-made rules that seek to limit the reach of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA). Congress passed the ICWA in response to the massive displacement of Native American children to non-Indian adoptive homes, foster care, and educational institutions by federal, state and private child welfare authorities. While there were a myriad of interrelated factors that led up to this Indian child welfare crisis, at its core was the failure of mainstream society to recognize and respect the cultural values and social norms of Native American nations. The assimilative attitudes that Native American children were better off growing up in a non-Indian environment did not surface overnight. Rather it percolated from centuries of U.S. sanctioned policies - from boarding schools, to placing out programs, to Indian adoption projects - aimed at the erasure of Native American cultures. The passage of the ICWA marked a reversal in federal Indian policy toward one of self-determination for Native American nations. However, judicially created exceptions to the ICWA, such as the Existing Indian Family doctrine, threaten to undermine this landmark legislation and return us to the policies of the past. In order to demonstrate how these judicially created exceptions perpetuate past assimilative attitudes, this article begins with a historical discussion of the treatment of American Indian children in this country. Within this larger historical context, the article provides a critique of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine and explores some current ideological debates that may be underlying recent challenges to the ICWA.","PeriodicalId":361185,"journal":{"name":"Suffolk University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"398 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suffolk University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20068871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

I don't know my own culture, . . . I am going to need your help in understanding . . . . Teach me, teach my children. These are the words of a forty-three-year-old Navajo woman on her first visit back to the Navajo Nation since her birth. Stolen as an infant, along with her twin brother, and adopted out on the black market, she was finally reunited with her family and community. Her journey home comes at a time when Native American nations are fighting proposed legislation and court-made rules that seek to limit the reach of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA). Congress passed the ICWA in response to the massive displacement of Native American children to non-Indian adoptive homes, foster care, and educational institutions by federal, state and private child welfare authorities. While there were a myriad of interrelated factors that led up to this Indian child welfare crisis, at its core was the failure of mainstream society to recognize and respect the cultural values and social norms of Native American nations. The assimilative attitudes that Native American children were better off growing up in a non-Indian environment did not surface overnight. Rather it percolated from centuries of U.S. sanctioned policies - from boarding schools, to placing out programs, to Indian adoption projects - aimed at the erasure of Native American cultures. The passage of the ICWA marked a reversal in federal Indian policy toward one of self-determination for Native American nations. However, judicially created exceptions to the ICWA, such as the Existing Indian Family doctrine, threaten to undermine this landmark legislation and return us to the policies of the past. In order to demonstrate how these judicially created exceptions perpetuate past assimilative attitudes, this article begins with a historical discussion of the treatment of American Indian children in this country. Within this larger historical context, the article provides a critique of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine and explores some current ideological debates that may be underlying recent challenges to the ICWA.
“过去永不消失”:对现有印度家庭教义的语境批判
我不了解我自己的文化……我需要你的帮助来理解. . . .教我,教我的孩子。这是一位43岁的纳瓦霍妇女自出生以来第一次回到纳瓦霍部落时说的话。她在婴儿时期和她的双胞胎兄弟一起被偷走,并在黑市上被收养,最终与家人和社区团聚。她的回家之旅正值美国土著民族反对立法提案和法院制定的旨在限制1978年《印第安儿童福利法》(ICWA)影响范围的规则之际。国会通过了《印第安儿童权利公约》,以应对联邦、州和私人儿童福利机构将大量印第安儿童转移到非印第安人收养家庭、寄养和教育机构的情况。虽然有无数相互关联的因素导致了印第安儿童福利危机,但其核心是主流社会未能承认和尊重印第安民族的文化价值观和社会规范。认为美国土著儿童在非印第安环境中长大会更好的同化态度并不是一夜之间就显现出来的。相反,它是从几个世纪以来美国认可的政策中渗透出来的——从寄宿学校到安置项目,再到印第安人收养项目——旨在抹去美洲原住民文化。ICWA的通过标志着联邦印第安人政策向美洲原住民民族自决方向的逆转。然而,《印度家庭法》的司法例外,如现行印度家庭原则,有可能破坏这一具有里程碑意义的立法,使我们回到过去的政策。为了证明这些司法上创造的例外是如何使过去的同化态度永续下去的,本文首先从对美国印第安儿童待遇的历史讨论开始。在这个更大的历史背景下,本文对现有的印度家庭教义进行了批评,并探讨了一些当前的意识形态辩论,这些辩论可能是ICWA最近面临的挑战的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信