SymFusion: Hybrid Instrumentation for Concolic Execution

Emilio Coppa, Heng Yin, C. Demetrescu
{"title":"SymFusion: Hybrid Instrumentation for Concolic Execution","authors":"Emilio Coppa, Heng Yin, C. Demetrescu","doi":"10.1145/3551349.3556928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concolic execution is a dynamic twist of symbolic execution designed with scalability in mind. Recent concolic executors heavily rely on program instrumentation to achieve such scalability. The instrumentation code can be added at compilation time (e.g., using an LLVM pass), or directly at execution time with the help of a dynamic binary translator. The former approach results in more efficient code but requires recompilation. Unfortunately, recompiling the entire code of a program is not always feasible or practical (e.g., in presence of third-party components). On the contrary, the latter approach does not require recompilation but incurs significantly higher execution time overhead. In this paper, we investigate a hybrid instrumentation approach for concolic execution, called SymFusion. In particular, this hybrid instrumentation approach allows the user to recompile the core components of an application, thus minimizing the analysis overhead on them, while still being able to dynamically instrument the rest of the application components at execution time. Our experimental evaluation shows that our design can achieve a nice balance between efficiency and efficacy on several real-world applications.","PeriodicalId":197939,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","volume":"471 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3556928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Concolic execution is a dynamic twist of symbolic execution designed with scalability in mind. Recent concolic executors heavily rely on program instrumentation to achieve such scalability. The instrumentation code can be added at compilation time (e.g., using an LLVM pass), or directly at execution time with the help of a dynamic binary translator. The former approach results in more efficient code but requires recompilation. Unfortunately, recompiling the entire code of a program is not always feasible or practical (e.g., in presence of third-party components). On the contrary, the latter approach does not require recompilation but incurs significantly higher execution time overhead. In this paper, we investigate a hybrid instrumentation approach for concolic execution, called SymFusion. In particular, this hybrid instrumentation approach allows the user to recompile the core components of an application, thus minimizing the analysis overhead on them, while still being able to dynamically instrument the rest of the application components at execution time. Our experimental evaluation shows that our design can achieve a nice balance between efficiency and efficacy on several real-world applications.
SymFusion:用于Concolic执行的混合仪器
Concolic执行是一种动态的符号执行,在设计时考虑了可伸缩性。最近的concolic执行器严重依赖于程序插装来实现这种可伸缩性。检测代码可以在编译时添加(例如,使用LLVM传递),也可以在执行时借助动态二进制转换器直接添加。前一种方法可以产生更高效的代码,但需要重新编译。不幸的是,重新编译程序的整个代码并不总是可行或实际的(例如,在存在第三方组件的情况下)。相反,后一种方法不需要重新编译,但会导致更高的执行时间开销。在本文中,我们研究了一种用于聚合执行的混合插装方法,称为SymFusion。特别是,这种混合检测方法允许用户重新编译应用程序的核心组件,从而最大限度地减少对它们的分析开销,同时仍然能够在执行时动态检测应用程序组件的其余部分。我们的实验评估表明,我们的设计可以在几个实际应用中实现效率和功效之间的良好平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信