Locked And Tied: Locking Chain And Change Of Problems

Kartini, Alfiah Khoirunisa, Raihan
{"title":"Locked And Tied: Locking Chain And Change Of Problems","authors":"Kartini, Alfiah Khoirunisa, Raihan","doi":"10.34306/itsdi.v3i1.500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchains are typically named as democratisation technologies, however ever, their relationship with the law and general democratic establishments remains uncertain. First, it compares blockchain technology with the broader theory of transparency. Second, it examines the link between transparency and democracy, and asks how blockchain technology mediates these relationships. Finally, it studies blockchain however technology affects specific manifestations of transparency and freedom of information. The conclusion of this text is that the relationship between transparency and democratic ideals is complex, controversial, and extremely contextual; the “democratized” technical transparency embedded within the blockchain will simply be evidenced in its application. It's undemocratic. while not considering the political gatekeepers and also the legal, social, and cultural desires that support these goals, blockchain technology cannot bring home the bacon the broader goals of transparency.","PeriodicalId":151610,"journal":{"name":"IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34306/itsdi.v3i1.500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Blockchains are typically named as democratisation technologies, however ever, their relationship with the law and general democratic establishments remains uncertain. First, it compares blockchain technology with the broader theory of transparency. Second, it examines the link between transparency and democracy, and asks how blockchain technology mediates these relationships. Finally, it studies blockchain however technology affects specific manifestations of transparency and freedom of information. The conclusion of this text is that the relationship between transparency and democratic ideals is complex, controversial, and extremely contextual; the “democratized” technical transparency embedded within the blockchain will simply be evidenced in its application. It's undemocratic. while not considering the political gatekeepers and also the legal, social, and cultural desires that support these goals, blockchain technology cannot bring home the bacon the broader goals of transparency.
锁和捆绑:锁链和问题的变化
区块链通常被称为民主化技术,然而,它们与法律和一般民主机构的关系仍然不确定。首先,它将区块链技术与更广泛的透明度理论进行了比较。其次,它研究了透明度和民主之间的联系,并询问区块链技术如何调解这些关系。最后,研究了区块链技术如何影响信息透明和自由的具体表现。本文的结论是,透明度与民主理想之间的关系是复杂的、有争议的,并且具有极强的语境性;嵌入在区块链中的“民主化”技术透明度将在其应用中得到证明。这是不民主的。虽然没有考虑到政治看门人以及支持这些目标的法律、社会和文化愿望,但区块链技术无法实现更广泛的透明度目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信