Understanding the Source of Confusion with Computational Thinking: A Systematic Review of Definitions

Fan Xu, Shuhan Zhang
{"title":"Understanding the Source of Confusion with Computational Thinking: A Systematic Review of Definitions","authors":"Fan Xu, Shuhan Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ISEC52395.2021.9764144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational Thinking (CT) is considered a necessary 21st-century competence that should be introduced to school education as a vital ingredient. However, the lack of a consensual definition of CT and the confusion with other similar terms made it a big challenge for researchers and practitioners to understand this concept. The purpose of this work-in-progress (WIP) is to identify and compare the existing definitions of CT proposed by various members of the education or research community, and ultimately to give educators and researchers suggestions on understanding this concept for particular purposes or situations. We conducted a systematic review of the definitions of CT from the source of academic articles and categorized the definitions based on their approaches, dimensions, and contexts. Forty-one unique and original concepts were extracted from the search. Results indicate that the existing definitions of CT were mostly formulated 1) with a prototype approach, 2) for the generic purpose of use, 3) in the context of K-12 education, 4) based on the subject of Computer Science. These results provide sufficient granularity to allow us to come up with suggestions on how to choose appropriate and pragmatic CT definitions.","PeriodicalId":329844,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC52395.2021.9764144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Computational Thinking (CT) is considered a necessary 21st-century competence that should be introduced to school education as a vital ingredient. However, the lack of a consensual definition of CT and the confusion with other similar terms made it a big challenge for researchers and practitioners to understand this concept. The purpose of this work-in-progress (WIP) is to identify and compare the existing definitions of CT proposed by various members of the education or research community, and ultimately to give educators and researchers suggestions on understanding this concept for particular purposes or situations. We conducted a systematic review of the definitions of CT from the source of academic articles and categorized the definitions based on their approaches, dimensions, and contexts. Forty-one unique and original concepts were extracted from the search. Results indicate that the existing definitions of CT were mostly formulated 1) with a prototype approach, 2) for the generic purpose of use, 3) in the context of K-12 education, 4) based on the subject of Computer Science. These results provide sufficient granularity to allow us to come up with suggestions on how to choose appropriate and pragmatic CT definitions.
理解计算思维的困惑来源:对定义的系统回顾
计算思维(CT)被认为是21世纪必要的能力,应该作为一个重要的组成部分引入学校教育。然而,CT缺乏共识的定义以及与其他类似术语的混淆使得研究人员和从业者理解这一概念成为一个巨大的挑战。这项正在进行的工作(WIP)的目的是识别和比较由教育或研究界的不同成员提出的CT的现有定义,并最终为教育工作者和研究人员在特定目的或情况下理解这一概念提供建议。我们从学术文章的来源对CT的定义进行了系统的回顾,并根据其方法、维度和背景对定义进行了分类。从搜索中提取了41个独特的原创概念。结果表明,现有的CT定义大多是1)基于原型方法,2)基于通用用途,3)基于K-12教育背景,4)基于计算机科学学科。这些结果提供了足够的粒度,使我们能够就如何选择适当和实用的CT定义提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信