{"title":"An Empirical Comparison of Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt Input Techniques","authors":"Xiaolei Zhou, Xiangshi Ren, Yue Hui","doi":"10.1109/ISPA.2008.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, coupling cursor position, angle and scale respectively. Comparisons between pressure input and tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very bad performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In \"experiment1-coupling to cursor position\", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In \"experiment2-coupling to cursor angle\", the tilt input performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time. In \"experiment3-coupling to cursor scale\", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time, but a little worse in terms of the degree of control that users exerted. These results will be useful for further user interface design.","PeriodicalId":345341,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2008.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, coupling cursor position, angle and scale respectively. Comparisons between pressure input and tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very bad performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "experiment1-coupling to cursor position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "experiment2-coupling to cursor angle", the tilt input performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time. In "experiment3-coupling to cursor scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time, but a little worse in terms of the degree of control that users exerted. These results will be useful for further user interface design.
本研究进行了三个实验,分别研究了人类控制笔压力和笔倾斜输入、耦合光标位置、角度和比例的能力。在三个实验中对压力输入和倾斜输入进行了比较。实验结果表明,减小压力输入导致性能很差,在三个实验中都不是一种好的输入技术。在“实验1-光标位置耦合”中,倾斜输入技术的表现相对优于加压输入技术,尽管倾斜输入技术的错误率略高。在“实验2-光标角度耦合”中,倾斜输入在时间上的表现相对好于递增压力输入。在“experiment3-coupling to cursor scale”中,倾斜输入在调整时间上略好于增加压力输入,但在用户的控制程度上略差。这些结果将对进一步的用户界面设计有用。