Credibility and Trust in Journalism

A. Schiffrin
{"title":"Credibility and Trust in Journalism","authors":"A. Schiffrin","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions of media trust and credibility are widely discussed; numerous studies over the past 30 years show a decline in trust in media as well as institutions and experts. The subject has been discussed—and researched—since the period between World Wars I and II and is often returned to as new forms of technology and news consumption are developed. However, trust levels, and what people trust, differ in different countries. Part of the reason that trust in the media has received such extensive attention is the widespread view shared by communications scholars and media development practitioners that a well-functioning media is essential to democracy. But the solutions discussion is further complicated because the academic research on media trust—before and since the advent of online media—is fragmented, contradictory, and inconclusive. Further, it is not clear to what extent digital technology –and the loss of traditional signals of credibility—has confused audiences and damaged trust in media and to what extent trust in media is related to worries about globalization, job losses, and economic inequality. Nor is it clear whether trust in one journalist or outlet can be generalized. This makes it difficult to know how to rebuild trust in the media, and although there are many efforts to do so, it is not clear which will work—or whether any will.","PeriodicalId":307235,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Questions of media trust and credibility are widely discussed; numerous studies over the past 30 years show a decline in trust in media as well as institutions and experts. The subject has been discussed—and researched—since the period between World Wars I and II and is often returned to as new forms of technology and news consumption are developed. However, trust levels, and what people trust, differ in different countries. Part of the reason that trust in the media has received such extensive attention is the widespread view shared by communications scholars and media development practitioners that a well-functioning media is essential to democracy. But the solutions discussion is further complicated because the academic research on media trust—before and since the advent of online media—is fragmented, contradictory, and inconclusive. Further, it is not clear to what extent digital technology –and the loss of traditional signals of credibility—has confused audiences and damaged trust in media and to what extent trust in media is related to worries about globalization, job losses, and economic inequality. Nor is it clear whether trust in one journalist or outlet can be generalized. This makes it difficult to know how to rebuild trust in the media, and although there are many efforts to do so, it is not clear which will work—or whether any will.
新闻业的信誉和信任
媒体信任和可信度问题被广泛讨论;过去30年的大量研究表明,人们对媒体、机构和专家的信任有所下降。自第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战之间的时期以来,这个问题就一直在讨论和研究,随着新形式的技术和新闻消费的发展,这个问题经常被重新讨论。然而,在不同的国家,信任水平和人们信任的东西是不同的。对媒体的信任受到如此广泛关注的部分原因是传播学者和媒体发展实践者普遍认为,一个运作良好的媒体对民主至关重要。但是解决方案的讨论更加复杂,因为关于媒体信任的学术研究——在网络媒体出现之前和之后——是碎片化的、矛盾的和不确定的。此外,数字技术在多大程度上混淆了受众,破坏了对媒体的信任,以及对媒体的信任在多大程度上与对全球化、失业和经济不平等的担忧有关,这些都还不清楚。也不清楚对一个记者或媒体的信任是否可以一概而论。这使得人们很难知道如何重建对媒体的信任,尽管有很多努力在这样做,但尚不清楚哪些会起作用,或者是否有任何作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信