The Printers’ Networks of Chen Qi (1186–1256) and Robert Estienne (1503–1559): A Micro-Comparative Approach to Political Dependence and Censorship

Chun Kin, F. Morche
{"title":"The Printers’ Networks of Chen Qi (1186–1256) and Robert Estienne (1503–1559): A Micro-Comparative Approach to Political Dependence and Censorship","authors":"Chun Kin, F. Morche","doi":"10.1017/9789048551002.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to demonstrate the pertinence of micro-historical sources\n to the comparative study of political institutions. We conduct two case\n studies of urban intellectual circles in thirteenth-century Song China and\n sixteenth-century France, comparing the intellectual output and personal\n networks of the Parisian printer Robert Estienne and of Chen Qi, a publisher\n in the Southern Song capital Hangzhou. Robert Estienne built his father’s\n printing business into a formidable European publishing house, publishing\n more than 500 works in his lifetime and gaining eminence as a scholar of\n Greek and the New Testament. His differences with the theological faculty\n of Paris over his critical editions of the bible eventually led him to move\n his workshop to Geneva. Some 300 years earlier, Chen Qi was exiled from\n Hangzhou following his publication of the Rivers and Lakes Collection 江湖集\n (Jianghu ji), which was deemed slanderous against the Southern Song Chief\n Councillor Shi Miyuan. The juxtaposition of the two cases allows us to inquire\n into the political dimension of their publishing activity and to contextualize\n the micro-historical narratives within regional histories of institutional\n development: to what extent were Chen Qi and Robert Estienne subjected\n to political arbitrariness? Was the forced exile and temporary character\n demolition of Chen Qi, compared to the career-enhancing self-exile of Robert\n Estienne, the result of a weaker institutionalization of censorship? What\n role did personal networks play in the development of political patronage?","PeriodicalId":162015,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800–1600","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800–1600","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048551002.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter aims to demonstrate the pertinence of micro-historical sources to the comparative study of political institutions. We conduct two case studies of urban intellectual circles in thirteenth-century Song China and sixteenth-century France, comparing the intellectual output and personal networks of the Parisian printer Robert Estienne and of Chen Qi, a publisher in the Southern Song capital Hangzhou. Robert Estienne built his father’s printing business into a formidable European publishing house, publishing more than 500 works in his lifetime and gaining eminence as a scholar of Greek and the New Testament. His differences with the theological faculty of Paris over his critical editions of the bible eventually led him to move his workshop to Geneva. Some 300 years earlier, Chen Qi was exiled from Hangzhou following his publication of the Rivers and Lakes Collection 江湖集 (Jianghu ji), which was deemed slanderous against the Southern Song Chief Councillor Shi Miyuan. The juxtaposition of the two cases allows us to inquire into the political dimension of their publishing activity and to contextualize the micro-historical narratives within regional histories of institutional development: to what extent were Chen Qi and Robert Estienne subjected to political arbitrariness? Was the forced exile and temporary character demolition of Chen Qi, compared to the career-enhancing self-exile of Robert Estienne, the result of a weaker institutionalization of censorship? What role did personal networks play in the development of political patronage?
陈琦(1186-1256)和罗伯特·艾斯安(1503-1559)的印刷网络:政治依赖和审查制度的微观比较方法
本章旨在证明微观历史资料对政治制度比较研究的针对性。我们对13世纪的中国宋朝和16世纪的法国城市知识分子圈进行了两个案例研究,比较了巴黎印刷商Robert Estienne和南宋首都杭州的出版商陈琦的知识产出和人际网络。罗伯特·艾斯安将他父亲的印刷事业发展成为一家令人敬畏的欧洲出版社,一生出版了500多部作品,并作为希腊文和新约的学者而声名显赫。他与巴黎神学院在《圣经》批判版本上的分歧最终导致他将工作室迁至日内瓦。大约300年前,陈奇因出版了《江湖集》而被逐出杭州,该书被认为是对南宋太监石宓远的诽谤。这两个案例的并置使我们能够探究他们出版活动的政治维度,并将制度发展的区域历史中的微观历史叙述置于语境中:陈琦和罗伯特·艾斯安在多大程度上受制于政治随意性?与罗伯特·艾斯安的自我放逐相比,陈琦的被迫流亡和短暂的人格毁灭,是审查制度化较弱的结果吗?个人网络在政治赞助的发展中扮演了什么角色?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信