The explore–exploit tension: A case study of organizing in a professional services firm

Aaron C. T. Smith, D. Gilbert, Fiona M. Sutherland
{"title":"The explore–exploit tension: A case study of organizing in a professional services firm","authors":"Aaron C. T. Smith, D. Gilbert, Fiona M. Sutherland","doi":"10.1017/jmo.2017.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on a case study of a decade-long organizing forms response to the need for groundbreaking innovation while maintaining existing operational performance – the explore–exploit conundrum. Employing ‘grounded research,’ data were collected on the experiences of the Asia-Pacific arm of a multinational professional service firm’s key decision-makers, innovators and entrepreneurs. The findings reveal a three-tiered organizing forms response to the explore–exploit paradox, characterized by a novel combination of heavy exploitation-driven actions alongside deep exploration projects. This case suggests that one successful approach to delivering on both explore and exploit focuses on a productive tension that emerges by enacting innovative organizing forms with contextual awareness. This productive tension was sufficiently powerful to impel individuals to innovate, but also sufficiently contained to avoid interfering with commercial outcomes. An explore–exploit framework conceptualizes organizational changes incorporating complexity and contradiction, without the implicit emphasis on removing or denying the existing tension.","PeriodicalId":379470,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Organization","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This article reports on a case study of a decade-long organizing forms response to the need for groundbreaking innovation while maintaining existing operational performance – the explore–exploit conundrum. Employing ‘grounded research,’ data were collected on the experiences of the Asia-Pacific arm of a multinational professional service firm’s key decision-makers, innovators and entrepreneurs. The findings reveal a three-tiered organizing forms response to the explore–exploit paradox, characterized by a novel combination of heavy exploitation-driven actions alongside deep exploration projects. This case suggests that one successful approach to delivering on both explore and exploit focuses on a productive tension that emerges by enacting innovative organizing forms with contextual awareness. This productive tension was sufficiently powerful to impel individuals to innovate, but also sufficiently contained to avoid interfering with commercial outcomes. An explore–exploit framework conceptualizes organizational changes incorporating complexity and contradiction, without the implicit emphasis on removing or denying the existing tension.
探索-利用张力:一个专业服务公司组织的案例研究
摘要本文报告了一个长达十年的组织形式的案例研究,以应对突破性创新的需求,同时保持现有的运营绩效-探索-利用难题。采用“有根据的研究”,收集了一家跨国专业服务公司亚太分公司关键决策者、创新者和企业家的经验数据。研究结果揭示了一种对探索-开发悖论的三层组织形式的响应,其特征是重度开发驱动的行动与深度勘探项目的新颖组合。这个案例表明,实现探索和开发的一个成功方法是通过制定具有上下文意识的创新组织形式来实现生产张力。这种生产张力足够强大,足以推动个人创新,但也足够克制,以避免干扰商业结果。探索-利用框架概念化了包含复杂性和矛盾性的组织变化,而没有含蓄地强调消除或否认现有的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书