{"title":"A failure of Keynesianism?","authors":"M. J. Oliver","doi":"10.4324/9780429431944-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two great merits of Keynes’ contribution to understanding an economy. The first was a return to analysing an economy in its aggregate, not at the level of individual consumer’s or firm’s behaviour or preferences. This meant that the fluctuations in a capitalist economy could be considered in their whole and not just ignored or dismissed. In other words, macroeconomics replaced microeconomics.","PeriodicalId":354357,"journal":{"name":"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431944-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are two great merits of Keynes’ contribution to understanding an economy. The first was a return to analysing an economy in its aggregate, not at the level of individual consumer’s or firm’s behaviour or preferences. This meant that the fluctuations in a capitalist economy could be considered in their whole and not just ignored or dismissed. In other words, macroeconomics replaced microeconomics.