Zapomniany romantyk versus współczesne wydania jego utworów – przypadek Tomasza Olizarowskiego

Kamila Supeł
{"title":"Zapomniany romantyk versus współczesne wydania jego utworów – przypadek Tomasza Olizarowskiego","authors":"Kamila Supeł","doi":"10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2022-1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I point out the flaws in recent editions of Tomasz Olizarowski’s works – starting from careless proofreading through not including printing mistakes from the first edition and ending with deliberate text deformation. All these factors affect the perception of every piece – its interpretation and the author’s workshop. However, most researchers who deal with the poet’s works sporadically, contextually and without a thorough examination of his entire legacy often reach for a random text source, many times without even being aware of the whole set of texts or the imperfections of existing editions. Discussing the situation of Olizarowski’s literary heritage leads us to reflect on the (analogous) case of the legacy of many other authors once deemed as “minorum gentium” and now almost completely forgotten.","PeriodicalId":239308,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","volume":"43 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2022-1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I point out the flaws in recent editions of Tomasz Olizarowski’s works – starting from careless proofreading through not including printing mistakes from the first edition and ending with deliberate text deformation. All these factors affect the perception of every piece – its interpretation and the author’s workshop. However, most researchers who deal with the poet’s works sporadically, contextually and without a thorough examination of his entire legacy often reach for a random text source, many times without even being aware of the whole set of texts or the imperfections of existing editions. Discussing the situation of Olizarowski’s literary heritage leads us to reflect on the (analogous) case of the legacy of many other authors once deemed as “minorum gentium” and now almost completely forgotten.
在这篇文章中,我指出了Tomasz Olizarowski作品的最新版本中的缺陷——从粗心的校对到不包括第一版的印刷错误,再到故意的文本变形。所有这些因素都影响着人们对每一件作品的看法——它的解释和作者的工作室。然而,大多数研究诗人作品的研究人员只是零星地、在上下文中进行研究,而没有对他的整个遗产进行彻底的研究,他们往往会找到随机的文本来源,很多时候甚至没有意识到整套文本或现有版本的不完善之处。讨论奥利扎罗夫斯基的文学遗产的情况,让我们反思(类似的)许多其他作家的遗产的情况,他们曾经被认为是“少数民族”,现在几乎完全被遗忘了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信