THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOODMORNINGS EXERCISE VS CONVENTIONAL STRENGTHENING EXERCISE IN SUBJECTS WITH MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN

S. Mary, J. Banu
{"title":"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOODMORNINGS EXERCISE VS CONVENTIONAL STRENGTHENING EXERCISE IN SUBJECTS WITH MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN","authors":"S. Mary, J. Banu","doi":"10.36678/ijmaes.2022.v08i04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the Study: Low back pain (LBP) is a very common and more than 10 million cases reported per year (India).The overall prevalence of low back pain was < 10% in the community. The prevalence of low back pain was more in women compared to men and it occurs more in the age group 20-35 compared to other age groups. Methodology: The study setting is Physiotherapy OPD ACS medical college and hospital campus with experimental study design. 30 subjects of both male and female between the age of 20-35 years who are brisk and who doesn’t have any previous illness with slump test negative were included. Group 1 (n=15) were given Good mornings with barbell exercise for 30 minutes and Group 2 (n=15) were given with conventional strengthening exercise for 30 minutes. The subjects were assessed pre and post to the treatment by Oswestry low back disability questionnaires and Visual Analogue Scale. Results: On comparing the Mean values of Group A & Group B on VAS Score, it shows significant decrease in the post test Mean values but (Group B - Strengthening) shows (2.53) which has the Lower Mean value is effective than (Group A - Barbell) (3.00) at P ≤ 0.05. Hence Null Hypothesis is rejected. On comparing the Mean values of Group A & Group B on Oswestry Disability Index(OSDI), it shows significant decrease in the post test Mean values but (Group B - Strengthening) shows (16.86) which has the Lower Mean value is effective than (Group A - Barbell) (19.60) at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: Therefore, this study proved conventional strengthening exercise plays a vital role in treating MLBP.","PeriodicalId":275373,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Exercise Science","volume":"535 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36678/ijmaes.2022.v08i04.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the Study: Low back pain (LBP) is a very common and more than 10 million cases reported per year (India).The overall prevalence of low back pain was < 10% in the community. The prevalence of low back pain was more in women compared to men and it occurs more in the age group 20-35 compared to other age groups. Methodology: The study setting is Physiotherapy OPD ACS medical college and hospital campus with experimental study design. 30 subjects of both male and female between the age of 20-35 years who are brisk and who doesn’t have any previous illness with slump test negative were included. Group 1 (n=15) were given Good mornings with barbell exercise for 30 minutes and Group 2 (n=15) were given with conventional strengthening exercise for 30 minutes. The subjects were assessed pre and post to the treatment by Oswestry low back disability questionnaires and Visual Analogue Scale. Results: On comparing the Mean values of Group A & Group B on VAS Score, it shows significant decrease in the post test Mean values but (Group B - Strengthening) shows (2.53) which has the Lower Mean value is effective than (Group A - Barbell) (3.00) at P ≤ 0.05. Hence Null Hypothesis is rejected. On comparing the Mean values of Group A & Group B on Oswestry Disability Index(OSDI), it shows significant decrease in the post test Mean values but (Group B - Strengthening) shows (16.86) which has the Lower Mean value is effective than (Group A - Barbell) (19.60) at P ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: Therefore, this study proved conventional strengthening exercise plays a vital role in treating MLBP.
在机械性腰痛患者中,早晨锻炼与常规强化锻炼的效果
研究背景:腰痛(LBP)是一种非常常见的疾病,每年报告的病例超过1000万例(印度)。在社区中,腰痛的总体患病率< 10%。与男性相比,女性腰痛的患病率更高,与其他年龄段相比,20-35岁的人群更容易出现腰痛。方法:研究环境为物理治疗OPD ACS医学院及医院校园,采用实验研究设计。研究对象男女各30名,年龄在20-35岁之间,身体轻快,既往无任何疾病,体能测试呈阴性。组1 (n=15)给予早安加杠铃运动30分钟,组2 (n=15)给予常规强化运动30分钟。采用Oswestry腰背功能障碍问卷和视觉模拟量表对治疗前后受试者进行评估。结果:比较A组和B组VAS评分的平均值,试验后的平均值均有显著降低,但B组-强化组的平均值(2.53)低于A组-杠铃组(3.00),P≤0.05。因此零假设被拒绝。比较A组和B组的Oswestry残疾指数(OSDI)均值,试验后均值显著降低,但B组-强化组(16.86)的均值低于A组-杠铃组(19.60)(P≤0.05)。结论:本研究证实常规强化训练在治疗MLBP中具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信