The New Social Developments of Durkheim and Merton Theories on Anomie in Modern Society

N. Meshcheryakova, L. Vasilenko
{"title":"The New Social Developments of Durkheim and Merton Theories on Anomie in Modern Society","authors":"N. Meshcheryakova, L. Vasilenko","doi":"10.30884/seh/2023.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the present article consider anomie as a natural manifestation of the process of social evolution, especially macroevolution. Macroevolution implies a qualitative transformation of some social institutions with their system of social control into other social institutions with a different set of norms and sanctions. During the process of social macroevolution, the following scenarios are systematically observed: the old systems of social regulation cease to function effectively, and the effective functioning of the new systems of social regulation does not yet begin. All this gives rise to the phenomenon of social anomie in all its variety of manifestations. The interpretations of anomie inspired by Durkheim and Merton still dominate the research literature. However, society is changing, so the theories created a century ago can hardly embrace all the nuances of the new social reality, such as the nonlinear behavior of a social system or the acceleration of social processes. We seek to understand how the anomie theory should be updated in order it could reflect the transformations of society and changes in social actors. So we introduce the concept of reflexive anomie. This concept helps us better understand seemingly unwarranted, high-profile crimes like the cases of Anders Breivik in Norway or Stephen Paddock in the USA. We compare and contrast two of the possible approaches to explaining these cases of asocial behavior: from the perspective of narcis-sistic personality disorder and reflexive anomie. The comparison of the","PeriodicalId":354072,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2023.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the present article consider anomie as a natural manifestation of the process of social evolution, especially macroevolution. Macroevolution implies a qualitative transformation of some social institutions with their system of social control into other social institutions with a different set of norms and sanctions. During the process of social macroevolution, the following scenarios are systematically observed: the old systems of social regulation cease to function effectively, and the effective functioning of the new systems of social regulation does not yet begin. All this gives rise to the phenomenon of social anomie in all its variety of manifestations. The interpretations of anomie inspired by Durkheim and Merton still dominate the research literature. However, society is changing, so the theories created a century ago can hardly embrace all the nuances of the new social reality, such as the nonlinear behavior of a social system or the acceleration of social processes. We seek to understand how the anomie theory should be updated in order it could reflect the transformations of society and changes in social actors. So we introduce the concept of reflexive anomie. This concept helps us better understand seemingly unwarranted, high-profile crimes like the cases of Anders Breivik in Norway or Stephen Paddock in the USA. We compare and contrast two of the possible approaches to explaining these cases of asocial behavior: from the perspective of narcis-sistic personality disorder and reflexive anomie. The comparison of the
迪尔凯姆与默顿现代社会失范理论的新社会发展
本文的作者认为社会反常是社会进化过程,特别是宏观进化过程的一种自然表现。宏观进化意味着一些具有社会控制系统的社会制度向具有不同规范和制裁的其他社会制度的质的转变。在社会宏观演化过程中,可以系统地观察到以下情况:旧的社会调控体系不再有效发挥作用,而新的社会调控体系尚未开始有效发挥作用。所有这些都导致了各种表现形式的社会反常现象。迪尔凯姆和默顿对社会失范的解释至今仍在研究文献中占据主导地位。然而,社会在不断变化,一个世纪前创造的理论很难涵盖新社会现实的所有细微差别,例如社会系统的非线性行为或社会进程的加速。我们试图了解社会反常理论应该如何更新,以便它能够反映社会的转变和社会行动者的变化。因此,我们引入了反身性失范的概念。这一概念有助于我们更好地理解那些看似毫无根据、引人注目的犯罪,比如挪威的安德斯·布雷维克(Anders Breivik)或美国的斯蒂芬·帕多克(Stephen Paddock)。我们比较和对比了两种可能的解释这些反社会行为的方法:从自恋型人格障碍和反身性失范的角度。的比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信