Business Judgment Rule: Defense for the Directors in Cases of Alleged Breach of Duties

Priya Kumari, Rishi Kumar
{"title":"Business Judgment Rule: Defense for the Directors in Cases of Alleged Breach of Duties","authors":"Priya Kumari, Rishi Kumar","doi":"10.53724/lrd/v4n3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article researchers will explain about Business Judgment Rule and how it can be used as a defence by the directors’ of the corporation. In simple language it can be said that the “Business judgment rule” is nothing but a judicially evolved doctrine derived out of case laws in the field of corporate laws. This doctrine has its origin in USA followed by U.K. The rule is in use in some form or the other in the common law countries e.g. whales, Australia, Canada, India &c. Australia has codified this rule under sec.1180(2) Corporations Act 2001, in South Africa Companies Act 71 of 200 section 76(4) provides for director’s duty to work towards best interest of the business with due care, skill and diligence, in India section 166(2) of Companies Act, 2013 requires that for the benefit of different constituencies of a company a director must act bona fide to promote the object of the company. The Business Judgment Rule tries to protect the directors of the company by creating a safe harbour for those who works for the betterment and interest of the corporations in an honest manner and in good faith. The scope of the paper is restricted to mainly US decisions, which has seen the greatest development in interpreting cases, though certain important landmarks in the Indian and UK context have also been referred to. The paper is limited by secondary sources such as books, articles and reports available on the subject.","PeriodicalId":388627,"journal":{"name":"Legal Research Development: An International Refereed e-Journal","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Research Development: An International Refereed e-Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v4n3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article researchers will explain about Business Judgment Rule and how it can be used as a defence by the directors’ of the corporation. In simple language it can be said that the “Business judgment rule” is nothing but a judicially evolved doctrine derived out of case laws in the field of corporate laws. This doctrine has its origin in USA followed by U.K. The rule is in use in some form or the other in the common law countries e.g. whales, Australia, Canada, India &c. Australia has codified this rule under sec.1180(2) Corporations Act 2001, in South Africa Companies Act 71 of 200 section 76(4) provides for director’s duty to work towards best interest of the business with due care, skill and diligence, in India section 166(2) of Companies Act, 2013 requires that for the benefit of different constituencies of a company a director must act bona fide to promote the object of the company. The Business Judgment Rule tries to protect the directors of the company by creating a safe harbour for those who works for the betterment and interest of the corporations in an honest manner and in good faith. The scope of the paper is restricted to mainly US decisions, which has seen the greatest development in interpreting cases, though certain important landmarks in the Indian and UK context have also been referred to. The paper is limited by secondary sources such as books, articles and reports available on the subject.
商业判断规则:董事在涉嫌违反职责案件中的辩护
在本文中,研究人员将解释商业判断规则以及它如何被公司董事用作辩护。用简单的语言来说,“商业判断规则”只不过是一种从公司法领域的判例法中衍生出来的司法演变原则。这一原则起源于美国,随后是英国。该规则在英美法系国家以某种形式被使用,如鲸鱼、澳大利亚、加拿大、印度等。澳大利亚根据《2001年公司法》第1180(2)条将此规则编纂为法典;南非《2001年公司法》第71条第76(4)条规定,董事有责任以应有的谨慎、技能和勤奋为企业的最佳利益而努力;印度《2013年公司法》第166(2)条要求,为了公司不同选区的利益,董事必须真诚地采取行动,促进公司的目标。《商业判断规则》旨在保护公司董事,为那些以诚实和善意的态度为公司的改善和利益而工作的人创造一个安全港。本文的范围主要限于美国的决定,这在解释案例方面取得了最大的发展,尽管也提到了印度和英国背景下的某些重要里程碑。论文是有限的二手资源,如书籍,文章和报告可用的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信