Critique of “Curriculum Theory and the Context of Curriculum”

D. Walker
{"title":"Critique of “Curriculum Theory and the Context of Curriculum”","authors":"D. Walker","doi":"10.2307/1179295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"George Willis has given us a complex paper that deals with a number of deep, persistent issues in curriculum theory. Actually, it can be viewed as two papers making the same point in different ways: curriculum theorists need to attend to a wider variety of meanings in the phenomena they theorize about. In the first part of his paper Willis criticizes the mainstream of modern American curriculum theorists for failing \"to come to grips with the underlying problem of how to conceptualize and deal with experience.\" In brief critical synopses of Tyler's Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Taba's Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice, and McNeil's recent chapter \"Forces Influencing Curriculum\" in the Review of Educational Research, he charges each of these authors with a one-sided attention to overt activities at the expense of inward experiences.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

George Willis has given us a complex paper that deals with a number of deep, persistent issues in curriculum theory. Actually, it can be viewed as two papers making the same point in different ways: curriculum theorists need to attend to a wider variety of meanings in the phenomena they theorize about. In the first part of his paper Willis criticizes the mainstream of modern American curriculum theorists for failing "to come to grips with the underlying problem of how to conceptualize and deal with experience." In brief critical synopses of Tyler's Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Taba's Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice, and McNeil's recent chapter "Forces Influencing Curriculum" in the Review of Educational Research, he charges each of these authors with a one-sided attention to overt activities at the expense of inward experiences.
“课程理论与课程语境”批判
乔治·威利斯给了我们一篇复杂的论文,讨论了课程理论中一些深刻而持久的问题。实际上,这可以看作是两篇以不同方式阐述同一观点的论文:课程理论家需要在他们理论化的现象中关注更广泛的意义。在论文的第一部分,威利斯批评现代美国课程理论家的主流未能“抓住如何概念化和处理经验的根本问题”。在泰勒的《课程与教学的基本原则》、塔巴的《课程发展:理论与实践》和麦克尼尔最近在《教育研究评论》上的一章《影响课程的力量》的简要评论中,他指责这些作者都片面地关注外在的活动,而忽视了内在的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信