Provenance and distribution networks of the earliest bronze in the Maritime Territory (Primorye), Russian Far East

Y.-K. Hsu, S. Klein, Rebecca O’Sullivan, I. Zhushchikhovskaya, Alexander N. Popov, N. A. Klyuev, Yu.G. Nikitin, Elena V. Sidorenko
{"title":"Provenance and distribution networks of the earliest bronze in the Maritime Territory (Primorye), Russian Far East","authors":"Y.-K. Hsu, S. Klein, Rebecca O’Sullivan, I. Zhushchikhovskaya, Alexander N. Popov, N. A. Klyuev, Yu.G. Nikitin, Elena V. Sidorenko","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2021.1958110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Metal artifacts from the Paleometal Epoch (ca. 1100 BC–400 AD) of the Primorye (Russian Far East) have shed new light on the introduction of the earliest bronzes into the Pacific coastal areas of prehistoric Eurasia. However, little is known about raw material circulation and the role of metal in the context of inter-regional exchange. This paper investigates 12 copper artifacts from major Paleometal settlements using alloy composition, trace elements, and lead isotopes to explore the metal sources and distribution networks. The results suggest that most objects are made of a copper-tin alloy, but some have arsenic as a significant minor element . Geologically, copper is unlikely to have come from local ore sources, but rather from the Liaoxi corridor and Liaodong Peninsula in Northeast China. This may indicate an inland route of metal trade across Northeast China or alternately, a coastal route via the northern Korean Peninsula. Archaeologically, the combined study of artifact typology and chemistry indicates two possible origins for the metal: the Upper Xiajiadian culture in Northeast China and Slab Grave culture in Mongolia/Transbaikal. Remarkably, the connection with Upper Xiajiadian communities parallels the transport route along which millet agriculture spread from Northeast China to the Primorye during the Neolithic.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2021.1958110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Metal artifacts from the Paleometal Epoch (ca. 1100 BC–400 AD) of the Primorye (Russian Far East) have shed new light on the introduction of the earliest bronzes into the Pacific coastal areas of prehistoric Eurasia. However, little is known about raw material circulation and the role of metal in the context of inter-regional exchange. This paper investigates 12 copper artifacts from major Paleometal settlements using alloy composition, trace elements, and lead isotopes to explore the metal sources and distribution networks. The results suggest that most objects are made of a copper-tin alloy, but some have arsenic as a significant minor element . Geologically, copper is unlikely to have come from local ore sources, but rather from the Liaoxi corridor and Liaodong Peninsula in Northeast China. This may indicate an inland route of metal trade across Northeast China or alternately, a coastal route via the northern Korean Peninsula. Archaeologically, the combined study of artifact typology and chemistry indicates two possible origins for the metal: the Upper Xiajiadian culture in Northeast China and Slab Grave culture in Mongolia/Transbaikal. Remarkably, the connection with Upper Xiajiadian communities parallels the transport route along which millet agriculture spread from Northeast China to the Primorye during the Neolithic.
俄罗斯远东沿海地区(滨海)最早青铜器的来源和分布网络
来自滨海地区(俄罗斯远东地区)的古金属时代(约公元前1100年-公元400年)的金属文物为史前欧亚大陆太平洋沿岸地区最早的青铜器的引入提供了新的线索。然而,人们对原材料流通和金属在区域间交换中的作用知之甚少。本文利用合金成分、微量元素和铅同位素对12件古金属聚落铜文物进行了研究,探讨了铜的来源和分布网络。结果表明,大多数物体是由铜锡合金制成的,但有些物体含有砷作为重要的微量元素。从地质角度来看,铜不太可能来自当地的矿石来源,而是来自中国东北的辽西走廊和辽东半岛。这可能意味着一条穿过中国东北的内陆金属贸易路线,或者是一条穿过朝鲜半岛的沿海路线。考古学上,器物类型学和化学的综合研究表明,这种金属有两种可能的起源:中国东北的上夏家店文化和蒙古/外贝加尔湖的板冢文化。值得注意的是,与上夏家店社区的联系与新石器时代谷子农业从中国东北传播到滨海地区的运输路线相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信