Growing Together or Growing Apart? A Village Level Study of the Impact of the Doha Round on Rural China

M. Kuiper, F. van Tongeren
{"title":"Growing Together or Growing Apart? A Village Level Study of the Impact of the Doha Round on Rural China","authors":"M. Kuiper, F. van Tongeren","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-3696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies of the opening of the Chinese economy focus at the national level. The few existing disaggregated analyses are limited to analyzing changes in agricultural production. The authors use an innovative village equilibrium model that accounts for nonseparability of household production and consumption decisions. This allows them to analyze the impact of trade liberalization on household production, consumption, and off-farm employment, as well as the interactions among these three aspects of household decisions. They use the village model to analyze the impact of price changes and labor demand, the two major pathways through which international trade affects households. Analyzing the impact of trade liberalization for one village in the Jiangxi province of China, the authors find changes in relative prices and outside village employment to have opposite impacts on household decisions. At the household level the impact of price changes dominates the employment impacts. Comparing full trade liberalization and the more limited Doha scenario, reactions are more modest in the latter case for most households, but the response is nonlinear to increasing depth of trade reforms. This is explained by household-specific transaction (shadow) prices in combination with endogenous choices to participate in the output markets. Rising income inequalities are a growing concern in China. Whether trade liberalization allows incomes to grow together or to grow apart depends on whether one accounts for the reduction in consumption demand when household members migrate. Assessing the net effect on the within-village income distribution, the authors find that poorer households that own draught power gain most from trade liberalization. The households that have to rely on the use of own labor for farm activities and are not endowed with traction power, nor with a link to employment opportunities in the prospering coastal regions, have fewer opportunities for adjustment.","PeriodicalId":163698,"journal":{"name":"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Most studies of the opening of the Chinese economy focus at the national level. The few existing disaggregated analyses are limited to analyzing changes in agricultural production. The authors use an innovative village equilibrium model that accounts for nonseparability of household production and consumption decisions. This allows them to analyze the impact of trade liberalization on household production, consumption, and off-farm employment, as well as the interactions among these three aspects of household decisions. They use the village model to analyze the impact of price changes and labor demand, the two major pathways through which international trade affects households. Analyzing the impact of trade liberalization for one village in the Jiangxi province of China, the authors find changes in relative prices and outside village employment to have opposite impacts on household decisions. At the household level the impact of price changes dominates the employment impacts. Comparing full trade liberalization and the more limited Doha scenario, reactions are more modest in the latter case for most households, but the response is nonlinear to increasing depth of trade reforms. This is explained by household-specific transaction (shadow) prices in combination with endogenous choices to participate in the output markets. Rising income inequalities are a growing concern in China. Whether trade liberalization allows incomes to grow together or to grow apart depends on whether one accounts for the reduction in consumption demand when household members migrate. Assessing the net effect on the within-village income distribution, the authors find that poorer households that own draught power gain most from trade liberalization. The households that have to rely on the use of own labor for farm activities and are not endowed with traction power, nor with a link to employment opportunities in the prospering coastal regions, have fewer opportunities for adjustment.
共同成长还是分开成长?多哈回合对中国农村影响的村级研究
对中国经济开放的研究大多集中在国家层面。现有的为数不多的分类分析仅限于分析农业生产的变化。作者使用了一个创新的村庄均衡模型,该模型考虑了家庭生产和消费决策的不可分离性。这使他们能够分析贸易自由化对家庭生产、消费和非农就业的影响,以及家庭决策这三个方面之间的相互作用。他们使用村庄模型来分析价格变化和劳动力需求的影响,这是国际贸易影响家庭的两个主要途径。分析了贸易自由化对中国江西省一个村庄的影响,作者发现相对价格和村外就业的变化对家庭决策产生了相反的影响。在家庭层面上,价格变化的影响主导了就业影响。比较全面贸易自由化和更有限的多哈回合情景,大多数家庭对后者的反应更为温和,但对贸易改革深度的增加的反应是非线性的。这可以通过家庭特定交易(影子)价格与参与产出市场的内生选择相结合来解释。在中国,日益加剧的收入不平等日益令人担忧。贸易自由化是否允许收入共同增长或分开增长取决于是否考虑到家庭成员迁移时消费需求的减少。在评估对村内收入分配的净影响时,作者发现,拥有干旱能力的较贫困家庭从贸易自由化中获益最多。在繁荣的沿海地区,那些不得不依靠自己的劳动力从事农业活动,没有被赋予牵引力,也没有就业机会的家庭,调整的机会更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信