{"title":"Actual Issues of Remote Court Hearings in Administrative Procedure","authors":"Eglė Bilevičiūtė","doi":"10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-7-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the e‐Justice strategy is to improve the implementation of the right to justice, cooperation between judicial authorities and the effectiveness of justice itself. Much attention has been paid to the computerization of court proceedings. Remote court hearings were recognized and described in the legal acts of the European Union and Lithuania already at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. However, this approach has not been widely used due to technical problems and insufficient regulation. The Covid‐19 pandemic affected all life and the economy. In order to preserve the human right to justice, not to interrupt the work of courts, remote court hearings were held. It has been found that in administrative justice, especially when organizing the work of quasi‐judicial structures, such hearings can be applied almost without problems. Therefore, the organization of remote meetings in administrative courts and quasi‐judicial organizations was continued during the non‐ quarantine year, depending on the wishes of the participants in the proceedings. However, the widespread use of teleconferencing and videoconferencing in the work of courts has identified the need to improve Lithuania’s legal framework. The article analyses the peculiarities of remote administrative procedure and legal regulation.","PeriodicalId":226699,"journal":{"name":"Acta Prosperitatis","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Prosperitatis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-7-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract The aim of the e‐Justice strategy is to improve the implementation of the right to justice, cooperation between judicial authorities and the effectiveness of justice itself. Much attention has been paid to the computerization of court proceedings. Remote court hearings were recognized and described in the legal acts of the European Union and Lithuania already at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. However, this approach has not been widely used due to technical problems and insufficient regulation. The Covid‐19 pandemic affected all life and the economy. In order to preserve the human right to justice, not to interrupt the work of courts, remote court hearings were held. It has been found that in administrative justice, especially when organizing the work of quasi‐judicial structures, such hearings can be applied almost without problems. Therefore, the organization of remote meetings in administrative courts and quasi‐judicial organizations was continued during the non‐ quarantine year, depending on the wishes of the participants in the proceedings. However, the widespread use of teleconferencing and videoconferencing in the work of courts has identified the need to improve Lithuania’s legal framework. The article analyses the peculiarities of remote administrative procedure and legal regulation.
e - Justice战略的目标是改善司法权利的落实、司法当局之间的合作以及司法本身的有效性。法庭诉讼程序的计算机化受到了很大的关注。在21世纪第二个十年之初,欧洲联盟和立陶宛的法律文件已经承认并描述了远程法庭听证会。然而,由于技术问题和监管不足,这种方法并未得到广泛应用。Covid - 19大流行影响了所有人的生活和经济。为了维护诉诸司法的人权,不妨碍法院的工作,举行了远程法庭听证会。人们发现,在行政司法中,特别是在组织准司法结构的工作时,这种听证会几乎可以毫无问题地适用。因此,在非隔离年期间,行政法院和准司法组织继续组织远程会议,这取决于诉讼参与者的意愿。但是,由于在法院工作中广泛使用电话会议和视频会议,因此需要改进立陶宛的法律框架。本文分析了远程行政程序的特点和法律规制。