Indirect Reciprocity and Reputation Management in Religious Morality Relating to Concepts of Supernatural Agents

Andreas Nordin
{"title":"Indirect Reciprocity and Reputation Management in Religious Morality Relating to Concepts of Supernatural Agents","authors":"Andreas Nordin","doi":"10.1558/JCSR.27256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns with reputation are found in relation to human notions about rank, honour, religious notions and sacred values. In cognitive and evolutionary approaches to religion, such as “adaptivist” and “by-product” theories, concepts of reputation are usually given only an indirect significance. From an “adaptivist” perspective, belief in supernatural punishment supports commitment enhancement and promotes intra-group competition, especially in the absence of concerns about reputational pressure. Alternative accounts, found in “by-product” and “standard model” – approaches, suggests that to attribute moral notions to supernatural agents derive from human cognitive systems devoted to social interaction and coordination entailing reputation monitoring. More profoundly, in altruist and mutualist models of human cooperation and morality, reputation implies different functions and, by consequence, reputation in “adaptivist” and “by-product” theories is awarded different degree of importance. The aim of this article is to analyse a predominant type of religious morality by focusing on conceptualisation of supernatural agents and the function of reputation monitoring. I shall compare altruist and mutualist accounts and adopt the latter to complement our understanding of the social cognitive machinery that underpins the relevance and attribution of moral notions to supernatural agents. I shall argue that concern about reputation is close at hand in the cognition of supernatural agents since: a) according to mutualistic theories, reputation holds a significant position in cooperation and morality and this has consequences for how religious morality ought to be modelled; b) supernatural agents are supposedly “full access agents” and aware of “strategic information” because they are omniscient agents that know everything of importance for a believer’s reputation and the dynamics of indirect reciprocity in which the believer takes part.","PeriodicalId":135438,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cognitive Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JCSR.27256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Concerns with reputation are found in relation to human notions about rank, honour, religious notions and sacred values. In cognitive and evolutionary approaches to religion, such as “adaptivist” and “by-product” theories, concepts of reputation are usually given only an indirect significance. From an “adaptivist” perspective, belief in supernatural punishment supports commitment enhancement and promotes intra-group competition, especially in the absence of concerns about reputational pressure. Alternative accounts, found in “by-product” and “standard model” – approaches, suggests that to attribute moral notions to supernatural agents derive from human cognitive systems devoted to social interaction and coordination entailing reputation monitoring. More profoundly, in altruist and mutualist models of human cooperation and morality, reputation implies different functions and, by consequence, reputation in “adaptivist” and “by-product” theories is awarded different degree of importance. The aim of this article is to analyse a predominant type of religious morality by focusing on conceptualisation of supernatural agents and the function of reputation monitoring. I shall compare altruist and mutualist accounts and adopt the latter to complement our understanding of the social cognitive machinery that underpins the relevance and attribution of moral notions to supernatural agents. I shall argue that concern about reputation is close at hand in the cognition of supernatural agents since: a) according to mutualistic theories, reputation holds a significant position in cooperation and morality and this has consequences for how religious morality ought to be modelled; b) supernatural agents are supposedly “full access agents” and aware of “strategic information” because they are omniscient agents that know everything of importance for a believer’s reputation and the dynamics of indirect reciprocity in which the believer takes part.
与超自然主体概念相关的宗教道德中的间接互惠与声誉管理
对声誉的关注与人类关于等级、荣誉、宗教观念和神圣价值观的观念有关。在宗教的认知和进化方法中,如“适应主义”和“副产品”理论,声誉的概念通常只被赋予间接的意义。从“适应主义”的角度来看,对超自然惩罚的信仰支持承诺增强,促进群体内竞争,特别是在不考虑声誉压力的情况下。在“副产品”和“标准模型”方法中发现的另一种解释表明,将道德观念归因于超自然行为者,源于致力于社会互动和协调的人类认知系统,包括声誉监控。更深刻的是,在人类合作和道德的利他主义和互惠主义模型中,声誉意味着不同的功能,因此,在“适应主义”和“副产品”理论中,声誉被赋予了不同程度的重要性。本文的目的是通过关注超自然代理人的概念和声誉监测的功能来分析一种主要的宗教道德类型。我将比较利他主义和互惠主义的说法,并采用后者来补充我们对社会认知机制的理解,这种机制支撑着道德观念与超自然行为者的相关性和归因。我认为,在对超自然行为者的认知中,对声誉的关注是近在咫尺的,因为:a)根据互惠理论,声誉在合作和道德中占有重要地位,这对宗教道德应该如何建模产生了影响;B)超自然的代理人被认为是“完全访问代理人”,并且知道“战略信息”,因为他们是无所不知的代理人,知道一切对信仰者的声誉和信仰者参与的间接互惠动态的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信