China’s Extreme Inequality: The Structural Legacies of State Socialism

The China Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.1086/725576
A. Walder
{"title":"China’s Extreme Inequality: The Structural Legacies of State Socialism","authors":"A. Walder","doi":"10.1086/725576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With modest income differences and virtually no private wealth four decades ago, China’s inequalities of income and wealth are now almost as extreme as in the United States and Russia. Despite unusually high levels of state control over national assets and strong fiscal capacity, redistribution of income and wealth is barely measurable. This puzzling outcome is a by-product of China’s highly distinctive political and economic structures, which retain many features of the prior state socialist model. These structures are designed to maintain Communist Party control, enforce the priorities of the central Party-state, and push rapid growth through high levels of investment. They include migration controls coupled with state ownership of land, an enduringly large capital-intensive state sector served by a financial system dominated by state banks, a tax base heavily dependent on the scale of production, a fiscal system that favors central priorities and drives subnational governments into land expropriation and property development, and the near absence of taxes on household property and related income.","PeriodicalId":250189,"journal":{"name":"The China Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The China Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With modest income differences and virtually no private wealth four decades ago, China’s inequalities of income and wealth are now almost as extreme as in the United States and Russia. Despite unusually high levels of state control over national assets and strong fiscal capacity, redistribution of income and wealth is barely measurable. This puzzling outcome is a by-product of China’s highly distinctive political and economic structures, which retain many features of the prior state socialist model. These structures are designed to maintain Communist Party control, enforce the priorities of the central Party-state, and push rapid growth through high levels of investment. They include migration controls coupled with state ownership of land, an enduringly large capital-intensive state sector served by a financial system dominated by state banks, a tax base heavily dependent on the scale of production, a fiscal system that favors central priorities and drives subnational governments into land expropriation and property development, and the near absence of taxes on household property and related income.
中国的极端不平等:国家社会主义的结构性遗产
四十年前,中国的收入差距不大,几乎没有私人财富,而现在,中国的收入和财富不平等几乎与美国和俄罗斯一样极端。尽管国家对国有资产的控制程度异常之高,财政能力也很强,但收入和财富的再分配几乎无法衡量。这种令人困惑的结果是中国高度独特的政治和经济结构的副产品,这种结构保留了以前国家社会主义模式的许多特征。这些结构旨在维持共产党的控制,执行中央党国的优先事项,并通过高水平的投资推动快速增长。这些因素包括:移民控制与土地国有制相结合;由国有银行主导的金融体系为长期庞大的资本密集型国有部门提供服务;税基严重依赖于生产规模;支持中央优先事项并推动地方政府进行土地征收和房地产开发的财政体系;以及对家庭财产和相关收入几乎不征税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信