Gaussian Stochastic Process Modeling of Blend Repaired Airfoil Modal Response Using Reduced Basis Mode Shape Approach

Jeffrey M. Brown, A. Kaszynski, Daniel L. Gillaugh, Emily B. Carper, Joseph A. Beck
{"title":"Gaussian Stochastic Process Modeling of Blend Repaired Airfoil Modal Response Using Reduced Basis Mode Shape Approach","authors":"Jeffrey M. Brown, A. Kaszynski, Daniel L. Gillaugh, Emily B. Carper, Joseph A. Beck","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-60238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A machine learning (ML) approach is developed to predict the effect of blend repairs on airfoil frequency, modal assurance criterion (MAC), and modal displacement vectors. The method is demonstrated on a transonic research rig compressor rotor airfoil. A parametric definition of blend geometry is developed and shown to be capable of encompassing a large range of blend geometry. This blend repair geometry is used to modify the airfoil surface definition and a mesh morphing process transforms the nominal finite element model (FEM) to the repaired configuration. A multi-level full factorial sampling of the blend repair design space provides training data to a Guassian stochastic process (GSP) regressor. The frequency and MAC results create a vector of training data for GSP calibration, but the airfoil mode shapes require further mathematical manipulation to avoid creating GSP models for each nodal displacement. This paper develops a method to significantly reduce blended airfoil mode shape emulation cost by transforming the mode shape training data into a reduced basis space using principal component analysis (PCA). The coefficients of this reduced basis are used to train a GSP that can then predict the values for new blended airfoils. The emulated coefficients are used with the reduced basis vectors in a reconstruction of blended airfoil mode shape. Validation data is computed at a full-factorial design that maximizes the distance from training points. It is found that large variations in modal properties from large blend repairs can be accurately emulated with a reasonable number of training points. The reduced basis approach of mode shape variation is shown to more accurately predict MAC variation when compared to direct MAC emulation. The added benefit of having the full modal displacement field also allows determination of other influences such as tip-timing limits and modal force values.","PeriodicalId":143309,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9B: Structures and Dynamics — Fatigue, Fracture, and Life Prediction; Probabilistic Methods; Rotordynamics; Structural Mechanics and Vibration","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9B: Structures and Dynamics — Fatigue, Fracture, and Life Prediction; Probabilistic Methods; Rotordynamics; Structural Mechanics and Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A machine learning (ML) approach is developed to predict the effect of blend repairs on airfoil frequency, modal assurance criterion (MAC), and modal displacement vectors. The method is demonstrated on a transonic research rig compressor rotor airfoil. A parametric definition of blend geometry is developed and shown to be capable of encompassing a large range of blend geometry. This blend repair geometry is used to modify the airfoil surface definition and a mesh morphing process transforms the nominal finite element model (FEM) to the repaired configuration. A multi-level full factorial sampling of the blend repair design space provides training data to a Guassian stochastic process (GSP) regressor. The frequency and MAC results create a vector of training data for GSP calibration, but the airfoil mode shapes require further mathematical manipulation to avoid creating GSP models for each nodal displacement. This paper develops a method to significantly reduce blended airfoil mode shape emulation cost by transforming the mode shape training data into a reduced basis space using principal component analysis (PCA). The coefficients of this reduced basis are used to train a GSP that can then predict the values for new blended airfoils. The emulated coefficients are used with the reduced basis vectors in a reconstruction of blended airfoil mode shape. Validation data is computed at a full-factorial design that maximizes the distance from training points. It is found that large variations in modal properties from large blend repairs can be accurately emulated with a reasonable number of training points. The reduced basis approach of mode shape variation is shown to more accurately predict MAC variation when compared to direct MAC emulation. The added benefit of having the full modal displacement field also allows determination of other influences such as tip-timing limits and modal force values.
混合修复翼型模态响应的高斯随机过程化基模态振型法
提出了一种机器学习(ML)方法来预测混合修理对翼型频率、模态保证准则(MAC)和模态位移矢量的影响。该方法在压气机转子翼型跨声速试验台上进行了验证。提出了一种混合几何的参数化定义,并证明它能够涵盖大范围的混合几何。该混合修复几何形状用于修改翼型表面定义,网格变形过程将标称有限元模型(FEM)转换为修复配置。混合修复设计空间的多级全因子采样为高斯随机过程(GSP)回归器提供了训练数据。频率和MAC结果为GSP校准创建了一个训练数据向量,但翼型模态形状需要进一步的数学处理,以避免为每个节点位移创建GSP模型。本文提出了一种利用主成分分析(PCA)将混合翼型模态振型训练数据转化为简化基空间的方法,以显著降低混合翼型模态振型仿真成本。这个减少的基础系数被用来训练一个GSP,然后可以预测新的混合翼型的值。仿真系数与简化的基向量一起用于混合翼型模态的重构。验证数据以全因子设计计算,使与训练点的距离最大化。研究发现,使用合理数量的训练点可以准确地模拟大规模混合修复引起的模态特性的大变化。与直接MAC仿真相比,模态振型变化的降基方法可以更准确地预测MAC的变化。具有全模态位移场的额外好处还允许确定其他影响,例如尖端时间限制和模态力值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信