What did the digital age mean for privacy in the United States?

Achyuth Rachur, J. Putman, Clifford Fisher
{"title":"What did the digital age mean for privacy in the United States?","authors":"Achyuth Rachur, J. Putman, Clifford Fisher","doi":"10.24052/jbrmr/v17is01/art-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the course of the last 3 decades, the world has seen monumental shifts in how information is collected, transmitted, and disseminated. Every aspect of our personalities that live on the internet, including our browser history, photos we post to social media, our shopping decisions and our selection of online friends, has been collated, quantified, and assimilated into a digital profile, which has skyrocketing value to an increasing number of businesses. With these developments in technology come the inevitable questions of ownership of such data, its use, misuse and even possible theft. This paper takes a comprehensive and comparative look at the data privacy legislature in the two largest data hubs in the world, namely the United States and the European Union. The paper also seeks to address the shortcomings of certain, past legislative decisions, and makes a recommendation for the future. To do this, we analyze the events of the past, using the 2016 Facebook/Cambridge Analytica data scandal as a focal point. On analyzing the major differences between American privacy law and the preeminent document on data privacy at the time, namely the Global Data Privacy Regulations (GDPR), we conclude that data privacy in the United States is in its nascent stages, in dire need of an overhaul. The California Consumer Privacy Act is the legislature that comes close to mimicking the function of the GDPR, albeit at a much smaller scale. The other remedies include the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA), which is already under consideration by Congress, or a state-by-state approach.","PeriodicalId":304986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v17is01/art-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the course of the last 3 decades, the world has seen monumental shifts in how information is collected, transmitted, and disseminated. Every aspect of our personalities that live on the internet, including our browser history, photos we post to social media, our shopping decisions and our selection of online friends, has been collated, quantified, and assimilated into a digital profile, which has skyrocketing value to an increasing number of businesses. With these developments in technology come the inevitable questions of ownership of such data, its use, misuse and even possible theft. This paper takes a comprehensive and comparative look at the data privacy legislature in the two largest data hubs in the world, namely the United States and the European Union. The paper also seeks to address the shortcomings of certain, past legislative decisions, and makes a recommendation for the future. To do this, we analyze the events of the past, using the 2016 Facebook/Cambridge Analytica data scandal as a focal point. On analyzing the major differences between American privacy law and the preeminent document on data privacy at the time, namely the Global Data Privacy Regulations (GDPR), we conclude that data privacy in the United States is in its nascent stages, in dire need of an overhaul. The California Consumer Privacy Act is the legislature that comes close to mimicking the function of the GDPR, albeit at a much smaller scale. The other remedies include the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA), which is already under consideration by Congress, or a state-by-state approach.
数字时代对美国的隐私意味着什么?
在过去的30年里,世界在信息的收集、传输和传播方面发生了巨大的变化。我们生活在互联网上的个性的每一个方面,包括我们的浏览器历史记录、我们发布到社交媒体上的照片、我们的购物决定和我们对在线朋友的选择,都被整理、量化并融入到一个数字档案中,这对越来越多的企业具有飙升的价值。随着这些技术的发展,不可避免地出现了这些数据的所有权、使用、滥用甚至可能被盗的问题。本文对世界上两个最大的数据中心,即美国和欧盟的数据隐私立法进行了全面的比较研究。该文件还试图解决某些过去立法决定的缺点,并为未来提出建议。为了做到这一点,我们分析了过去的事件,以2016年Facebook/剑桥分析公司的数据丑闻为焦点。通过分析美国隐私法与当时关于数据隐私的卓越文件《全球数据隐私条例》(GDPR)之间的主要差异,我们得出结论,美国的数据隐私处于萌芽阶段,急需彻底改革。《加州消费者隐私法》(California Consumer Privacy Act)是一部接近于模仿《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)功能的立法机构,尽管规模要小得多。其他补救措施包括《美国数据隐私和保护法》(ADPPA),该法案已经在国会审议中,或者是逐个州的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信