Systematic Literature Review: Earning Management in Corporate Governance

Yuni Ekawarti, M. Adam, E. Yusnaini, Hasni Yusrianti
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review: Earning Management in Corporate Governance","authors":"Yuni Ekawarti, M. Adam, E. Yusnaini, Hasni Yusrianti","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.220304.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide overall information from various studies in each scope and object of research that reveals the earnings management mechanism and its various determinants, especially flexible governance depending on the ownership structure and processes in the earnings management mechanism. This research method uses a systematic library process which consists of three stages, namely, planning, implementation, and reporting. This study uses 70 for this systematic literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Systematic literature results from all research contained in Scopus-indexed journals from 2019 to 2021. This study explains several competing hypotheses and hypotheses that have different applications between studies. Monitoring is more directed at accounting standards in America while the competing hypothesis is more directed at the Asian Region. The application of different accounting standards will result in positive or negative ownership behavior and governance functions. Variations concretely reveal the existence of research on earnings management deviation practices (manipulative) and earnings management efficiency. Conditions are determined by the structure of share ownership that gives a positive or negative value to the market value. So the essence of this literature study is to discuss the function of earnings management in corporate governance.","PeriodicalId":236304,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference (SEABC 2021)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference (SEABC 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220304.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to provide overall information from various studies in each scope and object of research that reveals the earnings management mechanism and its various determinants, especially flexible governance depending on the ownership structure and processes in the earnings management mechanism. This research method uses a systematic library process which consists of three stages, namely, planning, implementation, and reporting. This study uses 70 for this systematic literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Systematic literature results from all research contained in Scopus-indexed journals from 2019 to 2021. This study explains several competing hypotheses and hypotheses that have different applications between studies. Monitoring is more directed at accounting standards in America while the competing hypothesis is more directed at the Asian Region. The application of different accounting standards will result in positive or negative ownership behavior and governance functions. Variations concretely reveal the existence of research on earnings management deviation practices (manipulative) and earnings management efficiency. Conditions are determined by the structure of share ownership that gives a positive or negative value to the market value. So the essence of this literature study is to discuss the function of earnings management in corporate governance.
系统文献综述:公司治理中的盈余管理
本研究旨在从各个研究范围和研究对象中提供总体信息,揭示盈余管理机制及其各种决定因素,特别是盈余管理机制中取决于股权结构和流程的灵活治理。本研究方法采用系统的图书馆流程,包括计划、实施和报告三个阶段。本研究根据纳入和排除标准,采用70篇文献作为系统文献。系统文献结果来自2019年至2021年scopus索引期刊中包含的所有研究。这项研究解释了几个相互竞争的假设和假设,这些假设在研究之间有不同的应用。监控更多地针对美国的会计准则,而竞争假设更多地针对亚洲地区。不同会计准则的应用会产生积极或消极的所有权行为和治理功能。变异具体地揭示了盈余管理偏差实践(操纵)和盈余管理效率研究的存在。条件是由股权结构决定的,它赋予市场价值正或负的价值。因此,本文研究的实质是探讨盈余管理在公司治理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信