{"title":"B","authors":"Shun-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.1515/9783112599266-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let M be a compact Kählerm-manifold that has a Kähler metric ds2 = gαβ̄ dz α ⊗ dz̄ . Then it is known that, for the Ricci curvature tensor Rαβ̄ = −(∂2/∂zα∂z̄β) log det(gλμ̄), √−1 2π Rαβ̄ dz α ∧ dz̄ is a closed(1,1)-form and its cohomology class is equal to the first Chern class C1(M). Conversely, it was Calabi who asked if, for any closed (1,1)-form √−1 2π R̃αβ̄ dz α ∧ dz̄ that is cohomologous toC1(M), can one find a Kähler metric̃ gαβ̄ onM such thatR̃αβ̄ is the Ricci curvature tensor of̃ gαβ̄? As a consequence of Aubin and Yau’s results, one can find a Kähler–Einstein metric on M with C1(M) = 0 orC1(M) < 0. WhenC1(M) > 0, the space of Kähler–Einstein metrics are invariant under automorphism group. However, the existence does not always hold in general [F; M; T; TY]. Instead of the Kähler–Einstein metric, we consider the notion of extremal metrics due to Calabi [C1]. Namely, fix a Kähler class 0 = [ω0] on a compact Kähler manifoldM and denote byH 0 the space of all Kähler metrics with the same fixed Kähler class 0. Now consider the functional 8 : H 0 → R, 8(g) = ∫","PeriodicalId":388243,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Reich","volume":"306 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1929-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Reich","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112599266-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Let M be a compact Kählerm-manifold that has a Kähler metric ds2 = gαβ̄ dz α ⊗ dz̄ . Then it is known that, for the Ricci curvature tensor Rαβ̄ = −(∂2/∂zα∂z̄β) log det(gλμ̄), √−1 2π Rαβ̄ dz α ∧ dz̄ is a closed(1,1)-form and its cohomology class is equal to the first Chern class C1(M). Conversely, it was Calabi who asked if, for any closed (1,1)-form √−1 2π R̃αβ̄ dz α ∧ dz̄ that is cohomologous toC1(M), can one find a Kähler metric̃ gαβ̄ onM such thatR̃αβ̄ is the Ricci curvature tensor of̃ gαβ̄? As a consequence of Aubin and Yau’s results, one can find a Kähler–Einstein metric on M with C1(M) = 0 orC1(M) < 0. WhenC1(M) > 0, the space of Kähler–Einstein metrics are invariant under automorphism group. However, the existence does not always hold in general [F; M; T; TY]. Instead of the Kähler–Einstein metric, we consider the notion of extremal metrics due to Calabi [C1]. Namely, fix a Kähler class 0 = [ω0] on a compact Kähler manifoldM and denote byH 0 the space of all Kähler metrics with the same fixed Kähler class 0. Now consider the functional 8 : H 0 → R, 8(g) = ∫