Transnational social support from a postcolonial perspective

Alia Herz-Jakoby, F. Petermann
{"title":"Transnational social support from a postcolonial perspective","authors":"Alia Herz-Jakoby, F. Petermann","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2016.1277858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In researching current transnational phenomena and processes, Glick Schiller (2005) states that it is important to look at global inequalities and consider dimensions of power relations in order to inform a “new theory of society” (p. 439). Focusing on social support in a transnational context, we argue that a postcolonial perspective offers adequate theoretical tools in this respect. When speaking of transnational social support, we refer to a research focus on social processes that protect and support people in coping with a variety of difficult or burdensome situations that are not limited to national boundaries or local contexts (Chambon, Schröer, & Schweppe, 2012, p. 1). Since the perspective on transnational social support emerged from and is intertwined with research on social work in transnational settings, 1we refer to selected contributions from social work for our argument. To date, postcolonial perspectives have been rarely used in the analysis of power imbalances and inequalities inherent in social support across national boundaries. Castro Varela and Dhawan (2005) point out a difficulty with postcolonial theory: “Despite all attempts at clarification, the term ‘postcolonial’ remains imprecise and highly debated” (translated by authors) (p. 23). Therefore, we will define central aspects of postcolonial theory that we use in order to illustrate its benefits for research on transnational social support. Postcolonial scholars do not consider colonialism as a process that can be ascribed only to the past, but focus on both continuities and discontinuities of colonialism as policy and practice that continue today. Postcolonial studies include historical and current forms of colonialism and neo-colonialism, as well as different forms of resistance to colonialism and processes of decolonization (Abrahamsen, 2003; Castro Varela & Dhawan, 2005, p. 24; 2010). Historical legacies are viewed quite differently from a postcolonial rather than from a transnational perspective. Within postcolonial perspectives a historical sensitivity is always implicit; however, that does not mean that research is focused on historical analyses. Scholars claim to acknowledge that historical processes impact current processes or discourses and still influence current power imbalances. Within research on transnationalism as well as on transnational social support, historical perspectives have tended to be limited to historical analyses. We suggest applying a postcolonial perspective within research on transnational social support, to identify, describe, and explain persisting power relations and thus throw light on the relevant historical contexts of current transnational phenomena.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1277858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In researching current transnational phenomena and processes, Glick Schiller (2005) states that it is important to look at global inequalities and consider dimensions of power relations in order to inform a “new theory of society” (p. 439). Focusing on social support in a transnational context, we argue that a postcolonial perspective offers adequate theoretical tools in this respect. When speaking of transnational social support, we refer to a research focus on social processes that protect and support people in coping with a variety of difficult or burdensome situations that are not limited to national boundaries or local contexts (Chambon, Schröer, & Schweppe, 2012, p. 1). Since the perspective on transnational social support emerged from and is intertwined with research on social work in transnational settings, 1we refer to selected contributions from social work for our argument. To date, postcolonial perspectives have been rarely used in the analysis of power imbalances and inequalities inherent in social support across national boundaries. Castro Varela and Dhawan (2005) point out a difficulty with postcolonial theory: “Despite all attempts at clarification, the term ‘postcolonial’ remains imprecise and highly debated” (translated by authors) (p. 23). Therefore, we will define central aspects of postcolonial theory that we use in order to illustrate its benefits for research on transnational social support. Postcolonial scholars do not consider colonialism as a process that can be ascribed only to the past, but focus on both continuities and discontinuities of colonialism as policy and practice that continue today. Postcolonial studies include historical and current forms of colonialism and neo-colonialism, as well as different forms of resistance to colonialism and processes of decolonization (Abrahamsen, 2003; Castro Varela & Dhawan, 2005, p. 24; 2010). Historical legacies are viewed quite differently from a postcolonial rather than from a transnational perspective. Within postcolonial perspectives a historical sensitivity is always implicit; however, that does not mean that research is focused on historical analyses. Scholars claim to acknowledge that historical processes impact current processes or discourses and still influence current power imbalances. Within research on transnationalism as well as on transnational social support, historical perspectives have tended to be limited to historical analyses. We suggest applying a postcolonial perspective within research on transnational social support, to identify, describe, and explain persisting power relations and thus throw light on the relevant historical contexts of current transnational phenomena.
后殖民视角下的跨国社会支持
在研究当前的跨国现象和过程时,Glick Schiller(2005)指出,重要的是要关注全球不平等,并考虑权力关系的维度,以便为“新的社会理论”提供信息(第439页)。关注跨国背景下的社会支持,我们认为后殖民视角在这方面提供了足够的理论工具。在谈到跨国社会支持时,我们指的是一项研究,该研究关注的是保护和支持人们应对各种不限于国界或地方背景的困难或繁重情况的社会过程(Chambon, Schröer, & Schweppe, 2012, p. 1)。由于跨国社会支持的观点来自并与跨国环境下的社会工作研究交织在一起,在我们的论点中,我们引用了一些社会工作的贡献。迄今为止,后殖民视角很少用于分析跨国界社会支持中固有的权力不平衡和不平等。Castro Varela和Dhawan(2005)指出了后殖民理论的一个难点:“尽管有各种澄清的尝试,但‘后殖民’一词仍然不精确,而且争议很大”(由作者翻译)(第23页)。因此,我们将定义我们使用的后殖民理论的核心方面,以说明其对跨国社会支持研究的好处。后殖民学者不认为殖民主义是一个只能归因于过去的过程,而是关注殖民主义作为政策和实践的连续性和非连续性,这些政策和实践一直持续到今天。后殖民研究包括历史和当前形式的殖民主义和新殖民主义,以及不同形式的抵抗殖民主义和非殖民化进程(Abrahamsen, 2003;Castro Varela & Dhawan, 2005,第24页;2010)。从后殖民视角看待历史遗产的方式与从跨国视角看待历史遗产的方式截然不同。在后殖民视角中,历史敏感性总是隐含的;然而,这并不意味着研究的重点是历史分析。学者们声称承认历史进程影响着当前的进程或话语,并且仍然影响着当前的权力不平衡。在跨国主义和跨国社会支持的研究中,历史视角往往局限于历史分析。我们建议在跨国社会支持研究中应用后殖民视角,以识别、描述和解释持续存在的权力关系,从而阐明当前跨国现象的相关历史背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信