A Successful Failure or a Failed Success?

A. Ståhl, Jakob Tholander
{"title":"A Successful Failure or a Failed Success?","authors":"A. Ståhl, Jakob Tholander","doi":"10.1145/3363384.3363391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We reflect back on a previous paper writing process, where we initially set out to share experiences of forest walks and discuss how these were part of a design process for an application around sustainable grocery shopping. We describe our inability in finding a working way of articulating the experiences and the design process led us into route of unintended rationalization and systematization. Instead of strengthening our arguments and articulation of the value in our forest walks, we step by step rationalized our design decisions by tying them to discrete occurrences in the forest, shaping a paper that fitted the traditional form of HCI research. In this paper we reflect on this process and how our original intentions could be reached. Finally, we reason around the value of these forms of purposeless experiences in relation to design, and how there could be space for these types of contributions in HCI.","PeriodicalId":281851,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reflect back on a previous paper writing process, where we initially set out to share experiences of forest walks and discuss how these were part of a design process for an application around sustainable grocery shopping. We describe our inability in finding a working way of articulating the experiences and the design process led us into route of unintended rationalization and systematization. Instead of strengthening our arguments and articulation of the value in our forest walks, we step by step rationalized our design decisions by tying them to discrete occurrences in the forest, shaping a paper that fitted the traditional form of HCI research. In this paper we reflect on this process and how our original intentions could be reached. Finally, we reason around the value of these forms of purposeless experiences in relation to design, and how there could be space for these types of contributions in HCI.
成功的失败还是失败的成功?
我们回顾了之前的论文写作过程,在那里我们最初打算分享森林散步的经验,并讨论这些如何成为围绕可持续杂货购物应用程序设计过程的一部分。我们描述了我们无法找到一种表达体验的工作方式,设计过程将我们带入了无意的合理化和系统化的路线。我们没有在森林漫步中加强我们的论点和价值,而是通过将它们与森林中的离散事件联系起来,逐步使我们的设计决策合理化,从而形成符合传统HCI研究形式的论文。在本文中,我们反思了这一过程,以及如何达到我们的初衷。最后,我们将围绕这些与设计相关的无目的体验形式的价值进行推理,以及如何在HCI中为这些类型的贡献提供空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信