The Longitudinal Impact of Standardized Patient Encounters During Professional Education on Athletic Training Professional Practice

Kirk J Armstrong, Amanda J. Jarriel, Brittney M. Hardin
{"title":"The Longitudinal Impact of Standardized Patient Encounters During Professional Education on Athletic Training Professional Practice","authors":"Kirk J Armstrong, Amanda J. Jarriel, Brittney M. Hardin","doi":"10.4085/1947-380x-20-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Inquiry into the use of standardized patients (SPs) is growing in athletic training education; however, the impact of these SP encounters has not been examined beyond professional education.\n \n \n \n To understand how SP encounters during professional education benefited clinicians in their current clinical practice and in their transition to practice.\n \n \n \n Consensual qualitative research.\n \n \n \n Individual phone interviews.\n \n \n \n Thirteen professionals (7 women, 6 men; mean age = 28.15 ± 6.04 years) with postprofessional experience averaging 3.5 years (3.69 ± 1.43 years) participated in this study. Participant practice settings included college/university (4), high school (7), outpatient clinic (1), and military (1). Interviews were conducted until data saturation occurred.\n \n \n \n Data were collected via semistructured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using a consensual qualitative research design, data were independently analyzed by a 3-person team, who independently coded the data and compared ideas until consensus was reached. Trustworthiness was established through member checks.\n \n \n \n Two themes emerged from the findings that described the participants' perceptions of how they felt using SPs in the ATP facilitated their growth as a health care professional: (1) personal growth/development and (2) professional growth/development. Participants specifically noted that these encounters enhanced confidence, critical thinking, interpersonal communication, and patient rapport and aided in transition to practice.\n \n \n \n Athletic training professionals who experienced SPs during professional education revealed an increase in perceived confidence in clinical and interpersonal skills as they transitioned to independent practice. Additionally, participants highlighted that SP encounters should continue throughout the athletic training curriculum. Future research should involve participants from postbaccalaureate programs, as well as postprofessional and residency programs.\n","PeriodicalId":448792,"journal":{"name":"Athletic training education journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athletic training education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380x-20-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Inquiry into the use of standardized patients (SPs) is growing in athletic training education; however, the impact of these SP encounters has not been examined beyond professional education. To understand how SP encounters during professional education benefited clinicians in their current clinical practice and in their transition to practice. Consensual qualitative research. Individual phone interviews. Thirteen professionals (7 women, 6 men; mean age = 28.15 ± 6.04 years) with postprofessional experience averaging 3.5 years (3.69 ± 1.43 years) participated in this study. Participant practice settings included college/university (4), high school (7), outpatient clinic (1), and military (1). Interviews were conducted until data saturation occurred. Data were collected via semistructured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using a consensual qualitative research design, data were independently analyzed by a 3-person team, who independently coded the data and compared ideas until consensus was reached. Trustworthiness was established through member checks. Two themes emerged from the findings that described the participants' perceptions of how they felt using SPs in the ATP facilitated their growth as a health care professional: (1) personal growth/development and (2) professional growth/development. Participants specifically noted that these encounters enhanced confidence, critical thinking, interpersonal communication, and patient rapport and aided in transition to practice. Athletic training professionals who experienced SPs during professional education revealed an increase in perceived confidence in clinical and interpersonal skills as they transitioned to independent practice. Additionally, participants highlighted that SP encounters should continue throughout the athletic training curriculum. Future research should involve participants from postbaccalaureate programs, as well as postprofessional and residency programs.
职业教育中标准化患者接触对运动训练专业实践的纵向影响
规范化病人(SPs)在运动训练教学中的应用探讨日益增多;然而,除了专业教育之外,这些SP遭遇的影响还没有得到检验。了解在专业教育中遇到的SP如何使临床医生在他们当前的临床实践和他们向实践的过渡中受益。一致同意的定性研究。个别电话访谈。专业人士13人(女7人,男6人;平均年龄28.15±6.04岁,平均3.5年(3.69±1.43年)。参与者的实践环境包括学院/大学(4)、高中(7)、门诊诊所(1)和军队(1)。访谈一直进行到数据饱和。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并逐字记录和转录。采用一致同意的定性研究设计,数据由一个3人团队独立分析,他们独立编码数据并比较想法,直到达成共识。诚信是通过成员检查建立起来的。从调查结果中出现了两个主题,描述了参与者对在ATP中使用SPs如何促进他们作为医疗保健专业人员的成长的看法:(1)个人成长/发展和(2)专业成长/发展。参与者特别指出,这些接触增强了信心,批判性思维,人际沟通和患者关系,并有助于过渡到实践。在专业教育中经历过SPs的运动训练专业人员在过渡到独立实践时,表现出对临床和人际交往技能的信心增加。此外,参与者强调SP的接触应该贯穿整个运动训练课程。未来的研究应该包括来自学士学位后项目的参与者,以及专业后和住院医师项目的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信